Strengthening Environmental Responsibility through Ecological Citizenship at the Local Community Level

Sri Rahayu Pudjiastuti

doi:10.55927/ijaea.v5i1.16019

Authors

Sri Rahayu Pudjiastuti STKIP Arrahmaniyah Depok

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ijaea.v5i1.16019

Keywords:

Ecological Citizenship, Environmental Responsibility, Local Community, Community-Based Environmental Management, Sustainable Development

Abstract

Environmental degradation at the local community level is still an ongoing problem, which shows that a technical approach alone is not enough without strengthening citizens' environmental responsibility. From a civic perspective, ecological citizenship offers a conceptual framework that places environmental concern as an integral part of everyday civic rights, obligations, and practices. This study aims to analyze the role of ecological citizenship in strengthening environmental responsibility at the local community level. The research uses a mixed-methods approach with a sequential explanatory design. Quantitative data was collected through a structured questionnaire of 80 adults in a rural community in West Java, while qualitative data was obtained through in-depth interviews with eight key informants consisting of village officials, community leaders, environmental activists, and residents with varying levels of ecological citizenship. Quantitative data analysis was carried out using descriptive statistics, correlation tests, and simple linear regression, while qualitative data was analyzed through thematic analysis and triangulation. The results of the study show that ecological citizenship has a positive and significant effect on environmental responsibility, especially in encouraging pro-environmental behaviors such as waste management, collective participation, and compliance with local environmental norms. Qualitative findings corroborate that social norms, local leadership, and community-based environmental programs play an important role in actualizing ecological awareness into concrete action. This study concludes that strengthening ecological citizenship at the local community level is a key strategy in building sustainable environmental responsibility and making a practical contribution to the development of citizenship-based environmental governance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agrawal, A. (2022). The role of local institutions in environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 47, 337–361. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-112420-020206

Barry, J., & Leonard, L. (2021). Politics, ethics, and the environment: Citizenship in the age of climate crisis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003033377

Bennett, N. J., Blythe, J., White, C. S., & Campero, C. (2021). Blue growth and ecological citizenship. Marine Policy, 124, 104329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104329

Bouman, T., Steg, L., & Kiers, H. A. L. (2020). Measuring values in environmental research. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 67, 101386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101386

Clayton, S., Whitmarsh, L., Xu, P., & Carrico, A. (2021). Psychological research and global climate change. Nature Climate Change, 11(5), 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01014-2

Cox, M. (2021). Advancing the diagnostic analysis of environmental governance systems. Environmental Science and Policy, 124, 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.06.014

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2021). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dobson, A. (2021). Citizenship and the environment. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198839503.001.0001

Dobson, A., & Bell, D. (2023). Environmental citizenship. MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262047734/

Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2020). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 55(2), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.13273

Field, A. (2022). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Forno, F., & Graziano, P. (2020). Sustainable community movements and local leadership. Sustainability, 12(8), 3154. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083154

Guest, G., Namey, E., & Salvo, J. (2023). Collecting and analyzing qualitative data at scale. SAGE Publications.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7

Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2021). Research ethics for social scientists (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Jagers, S. C., Martinsson, J., & Matti, S. (2020). Ecological citizenship: A driver of pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Politics, 29(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1678904

Jansson, J., Marell, A., & Nordlund, A. (2021). Exploring consumer adoption of ecological behaviors. Sustainable Development, 29(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2134

Kenis, A., & Mathijs, E. (2022). Beyond individual behaviour change: The role of ecological citizenship. Environmental Politics, 31(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1985630

Li, X., Nguyen, T. T., & Patel, R. (2023). Determinants of pro-environmental behaviour in community settings. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 82, 101845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101845

Liu, Y., & Zhang, X. (2022). Citizenship norms and sustainable environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, 101735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101735

Pretty, J., Benton, T. G., Bharucha, Z. P., Dicks, L. V., Flora, C. B., Godfray, H. C. J., & Hartley, S. (2021). The role of community-based approaches in sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 4(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00690-1

Pudjiastuti, S. R. (2020). Utilization of forest natural resource potentials, especially wood, to realize independence of regional development. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical & Control Systems, 12. https://doi.org/10.5373/JARDCS/V12I2/S20201212

Pudjiastuti, S. R., & Hardianto, L. (2024). Ecological citizenship based on green constitution through environmental education. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan (JIP) STKIP Kusuma Negara, 16(1), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.37640/jip.v16i1.2088

Resosudarmo, B. P., Hartono, D., & Nurdianto, D. A. (2021). Political economy of natural resource governance in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 57(2), 141–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2021.1909690

Roca, M., & Martin, I. (2024). Measuring ecological responsibility beyond self-reported behavior. Ecological Economics, 214, 107952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107952

Saward, M. (2020). Making democratic connections: Citizenship, representation and political participation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198841834.001.0001

Schlosberg, D. (2025). Environmental justice and the politics of recognition. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429282406

Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., & McNeill, J. R. (2021). The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The great acceleration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(8), e2020133118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2020133118

Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Vandenbergh, M. P. (2022). Toward a science of climate and sustainability decisions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(19), e2108641119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108641119

Taber, K. S. (2021). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 51(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09945-1

West, S., Haider, L. J., Sinare, H., & Karpouzoglou, T. (2022). Beyond participation: The value of social learning in sustainability. Ecology and Society, 27(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13057-270117