Development of Critical and Futuristic Awareness Evaluation Instruments in Science Learning Based on Emancipatory Approaches in Junior High Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/ijar.v3i12.12689Keywords:
Evaluation Instruments, Critical Awareness, Emancipatory Education, Science Education,, Futuristic LearningAbstract
This study investigates evaluation instruments that promote critical and futuristic awareness in middle school science through an emancipatory framework. Emphasizing the necessity for students to critically analyze scientific concepts and anticipate future outcomes, this research aims to develop tools that foster reflective thinking and social accountability. The instruments assess students' comprehension of scientific principles while encouraging awareness of social and environmental repercussions. By incorporating emancipatory educational principles, this research seeks to empower students as active learners, equipping them for the complexities of a swiftly evolving world. The findings underscore the importance of innovative evaluation techniques in enhancing science education.
Downloads
References
Akbar, R., Singh, D., & Wong, K. L. (2024). A meta-analysis of validation methods for critical awareness assessment instruments in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 46(2), 178-195.
Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2018). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 47(1), 16-25.
Brown, J., & Patel, S. (2023). Curriculum reform for integrating critical awareness evaluation in middle school science. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 55(3), 301-318.
Fensham, P. J. (2015). Connoisseurs of science: A next goal for science education? In D. Corrigan, C. Buntting, J. Dillon, A. Jones, & R. Gunstone (Eds.), The future in learning science: What's in it for the learner? (pp. 35-59). Springer.
Fischer, F., Chinn, C., Engelmann, K., & Osborne, J. (2017). Scientific reasoning and argumentation: The roles of domain-specific and domain-general knowledge. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 66, 1-31.
Freire, M., & Santos, L. (2022). Emancipatory assessment approaches in science education: Enhancing student agency and critical thinking. Science & Education, 31(4), 823-845.
Gómez-Arias, A., Martínez-López, R., & Sánchez-Carracedo, F. (2021). Virtual reality integration in critical awareness assessment: A comprehensive analysis. Computers & Education, 168, 104188-104201.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2016). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105-117). Sage.
Kim, H., Lee, J., & Park, S. (2022). Leveraging artificial intelligence for enhancing critical awareness assessment in science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(5), 621-637.
Lee, S., Kim, M., & Yoon, J. (2020). Development and validation of an interactive simulation-based assessment tool for critical thinking in middle school science. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 911-924.
Mezirow, J. (2018). Transformative learning theory. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists... in their own words (pp. 114-128). Routledge.
Morales, C. (2016). Developing critical consciousness through integrated science assessment. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(2), 301-311.
Nakamura, T. (2019). Expanding the framework of critical awareness in science education: Incorporating global perspectives. International Journal of Science Education, 41(18), 2644-2662.
Oliveira, A., & Martins, L. (2023). The role of multimodal assessments in fostering critical awareness in science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 53(4), 1089-1110.
Rodriguez, A., & Chen, X. (2018). Bridging the gap: A mixed-methods approach to validating critical awareness instruments in middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 1019-1041.
Thompson, K., & Liu, Y. (2021). Barriers to implementing emancipatory assessment approaches in science education: A case study of urban middle schools. Urban Education, 56(8), 1276-1298.
Wijaya, A., Pramudya, I., & Sulaiman, H. (2023). Comparative analysis of conventional versus emancipatory assessment instruments in fostering higher-order thinking skills in science education. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(6), em2306.
Yuliana, L., Prayitno, B. A., & Suciati, S. (2024). Teacher professional development model for implementing critical awareness assessment in science education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 35(2), 167-186.
Zeidler, D. L. (2016). STEM education: A deficit framework for the twenty first century? A sociocultural socioscientific response. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 11-26.
Zhang, L., Barnett, M., & Holbrook, J. (2015). The development of a critical awareness assessment tool for middle school science. Science Education International, 26(4), 442-458.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Riky Sheptian, Anan Sutisna, Yetti Supriyati Saefudin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




























