Analysis of Precast Concrete Construction Cost Comparison with Conventional Concrete in Building (Case Study of A1 & A2 Building) Sartikaasih Bhayangkara Hospital Bandung)

Fikri Wahidan; Pony Rahayu; Erik Rizky Ramadhan; Ohan Farhan

doi:10.55927/ijar.v4i7.14976

Authors

Fikri Wahidan University of Swadaya Gunung Jati
Pony Rahayu University of Swadaya Gunung Jati
Erik Rizky Ramadhan University of Swadaya Gunung Jati
Ohan Farhan University of Swadaya Gunung Jati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ijar.v4i7.14976

Keywords:

Concrete, Precast, Conventional, Cost, Time

Abstract

This study discusses the comparison of cost and time efficiency between precast and conventional concrete systems in the structural work of building construction. The research adopts a quantitative comparative approach on two segments of the Sartikaasih Bhayangkara Hospital project in Bandung. The BoQ calculation results show that the precast system incurred lower total costs, amounting to IDR 17.6 billion (A1) and IDR 12.74 billion (A2), compared to the conventional system with IDR 19.86 billion (A1) and IDR 14.29 billion (A2). In terms of time, the precast system demonstrated significant efficiency, with savings of 65.02% on A1 and 21.43% on (A2). This efficiency contributes to the reduction of indirect costs and the risk of project delays. These findings indicate that the precast system can serve as a more economical and efficient alternative for building construction projects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alvandi, B., Rosyati, R., & Abdu, M. (2021). Analisis Perbandingan Biaya Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Balok Metode Konvensional Dan Precast Pada Proyek Aspena Residence Batuceper. Structure, 3(1), 96.

Cainawa, R. (2020). Perbandingan Metode Pelaksanaan Beton Konvensional Dengan Pra Cetak Terhadap Biaya Dan Waktu (Studi Kasus: Pekerjaan …. Kurva Mahasiswa, 1–9.

Najoan, C. H., Tjakra, J., & Pratasis, P. A. K. (2017). Militer Manado). 4(2016), 319–327.

Nauly, A., Rambe, M. R., & Patriotika, F. (2022). Analisa Perbandingan Biaya Dan Waktu Pelaksanaan Pelat Lantai Konvensional Dengan Pelat Lantai Pracetak Pada Gedung Berlantai Tiga. Statika, 5(2), 55–62.

Pakiding, Y. (2022). Perbandingan Pelaksanaan Struktur Beton Sistem Cast In Situ Dan Precast Terhadap Biaya Dan Waktu Pelaksanaannya (Studi Kasus : Proyek Pembangunan Rumah Susun Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan, Jalan Poros Sa’dan (Kampus II UKI Toraja). Journal on Education, 04(04), 2138–2145.

Pramana, I. M. W., Arya, I. W., & Wiraga, I. W. (2023). Jurnal Talenta Sipil. 6(2), 328–335.

Rahmadia, N., Muhyi, A. Al, & Prima, U. (2024). Optimasi Penggunaan Beton Precast : Meningkatkan Keberlanjutan dan Kecepatan Konstruksi. 14(01), 153–158.

Rani, H. A., & Fuadi, Z. (2016). Efisiensi dan Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Struktur Kolom Antara Metode Precast dengan Konvensional. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Universitas Syiah Kuala, 5(3), 269–278.

Senduk, N., Willar, D., Taju, D., & Amiman, S. (2022). Perbandingan Biaya Pelaksanaan Pekerjaan Beton Pracetak dan Konvensional pada Proyek Rumah Susun. Jurnal Teknik Sipil Terapan, 4(2), 58.

Špak, M., Kozlovská, M., Struková, Z., & Bašková, R. (2016). Comparison of Conventional and Advanced Concrete Technologies in terms of Construction Efficiency. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2016.

Teknik, F., Mulawarman, U., Alkas, M. J., Sari, D. P., & Ramadanri, N. A. (2024). Analisa Perbandingan Biaya , Waktu , dan Metode Kerja Beton In-Situ. September.

Zainul Khakim, M. Ruslin Anwar, M. H. H. (2011). Teknologi Penyediaan Air Bersih. Jakarta (ID) : PT Rineka Cipta. Studi Pemilihan Pengerjaan Beton Antara Pracetak Dan Konvensional Pada Pelaksanaan Konstruksi Gedung Dengan Metode Ahp, 5(2).