Historical Materialism and Social Development: Reconstructing a Marxist Theory in the Age of Contemporary Social Theory

Ye Si Thu  Aung

doi:10.55927/ijar.v5i2.16250

Authors

Ye Si Thu Aung Vietnam National University, Hanoi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ijar.v5i2.16250

Keywords:

Capitalist Transformation, Historical Materialism, Modes of Production, Multi-Causal Social Theory, Social Development

Abstract

This paper argues that Karl Marx’s theory of historical materialism remains partially valid and analytically fruitful when reformulated in dialogue with contemporary social theory. After clarifying social development, it reconstructs the core claims of forces and relations of production, class struggle, and modes of production. It examines failed empirical predictions, doubts about socialism or communism, objections to economic reductionism, and concerns about Eurocentrism. By placing historical materialism into conversation with structural functionalism, conflict theory, interpretive approaches, rational-choice and biosocial accounts, it proposes a non-teleological, multi-causal reconstruction retaining its explanatory core for digital capitalism and global inequality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

College, OpenStax, OpenStax, Tonja R. Conerly, et al. 2021. Introduction to Sociology 3e. XanEdu Publishing Inc.

Feuerwerker, Albert. 1984. “The State and the Economy in Late Imperial China.” Theory and Society 13 (3): 297–326.

Giddens, Anthony. 1971. Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803109.

Giddens, Anthony. 1979. “Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis.” 1st ed. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4.

Hayek, F. A. 1945. “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” The American Economic Review 35 (4): 519–30.

“Introduction to Sociology 3e by OpenStax (Official Print Version, Paperback Version, B&W): OpenStax: 9781711493978: Amazon.Com: Books.” n.d. Accessed January 3, 2026. https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Sociology-OpenStax-Official-paperback/dp/171149397X.

Mann, Michael. 2012. The Sources of Social Power: Volume 3: Global Empires and Revolution, 1890–1945. Vol. 3. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139236751.

Marx, Karl. 2014. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Translated by N. I. (Nahum Isaac) Stone. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/46423.

Ohbayashi, Katsuyuki, Eric Nielsen, Katherine Calhoun, and Neal Hoffman. 1986. “Major Themes in Economics, v.2, 1986.” Major Themes in Economics (Original Series, 1985-1986), January 1. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/mtie_os_v1_v2/2.

Okunade, Solomon O., Oyindamola O. Adeyemo, Oluwole J. Adeyemi, and Evans Osabuohien. 2025. “Migration, Factor Mobility and Economic Complexity in African Countries.” Scientific African 27 (March): e02601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e02601.

Pope, Whitney. 1975. “Durkheim as a Functionalist.” The Sociological Quarterly 16 (3): 361–79.

Shimp, Kaleb. 2009. “The Validity of Karl Marx’s Theory of Historical Materialism.” Major Themes in Economics 11 (1): 35–56.

“The Cyclic Theory.” n.d. This Week in Palestine. Accessed January 3, 2026. https://thisweekinpalestine.com/the-last-word-320/.

The Protestant Ethic Thesis – EH.Net. n.d. Accessed January 3, 2026. https://eh.net/encyclopedia/the-protestant-ethic-thesis/.

Wolff, Jonathan, and David Leopold. 2025. “Karl Marx.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Fall 2025, edited by Edward N. Zalta and Uri Nodelman. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2025/entries/marx/.