Global Trends in Teacher Management: Evidence from a Global Bibliometric Systematic Review (2020–2026)

Authors

  • Andi Nur Qalbi Doctoral Program, Graduate School, Makassar State University
  • Ardiansyah Doctoral Program, Graduate School, Makassar State University
  • Anshar Doctoral Program, Graduate School, Makassar State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ijar.v5i5.16496

Keywords:

Teacher Management, Bibliometric Analysis, Systematic Literature Review, Teacher Retention, Education Policy, Indonesia

Abstract

This study develops an integrative perspective on teacher management by addressing the fragmentation that characterizes much of the existing literature. Using a Systematic Literature Review (SLR) combined with bibliometric analysis, the study examines global research trends from 2020 to 2026. Data were retrieved from Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, resulting in 50 initial records, which were systematically filtered using the PRISMA protocol into 50 relevant articles. The findings reveal a substantial increase in scholarly attention to teacher management, particularly after the COVID-19 pandemic. More importantly, the focus of research has shifted from administrative concerns toward more complex dimensions, including teacher wellbeing, retention, and digital competence. Bibliometric mapping identifies four dominant clusters: professional development, teacher retention and motivation, digital transformation, and teacher wellbeing. Building on these insights, this study proposes an integrative model of teacher management that connects recruitment, distribution, professional development, and wellbeing within a systemic and adaptive framework. The analysis also highlights a divergence between developed and developing countries, emphasizing the importance of contextual adaptation. In the Indonesian context, this implies aligning global practices with local realities. This study contributes by bridging bibliometric evidence with comparative analysis, offering both theoretical integration and practical insights for sustainable education policy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrams, L. (2025). Inclusive education models in Nordic countries: Reducing educational inequality. Journal of Educational Policy, 40(2), 123-140.

Bischoff, K., Owens, A. The Segregation of Opportunity: Social and Financial Resources in the Educational Contexts of Lower- and Higher-Income Children, 1990–2014. Demography 56, 1635–1664 (2019).

Bischoff, K., Owens, A. The Segregation of Opportunity: Social and Financial Resources in the Educational Contexts of Lower- and Higher-Income Children, 1990–2014. Demography 56, 1635–1664 (2019).

Condron, D. J., & Roscigno, V. J. (2003). Disparities within: Unequal spending and achievement in an urban school district. Sociology of Education, 76(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090259

Darling-Hammond, L. (2007). Race, inequality, and educational accountability: The irony of No Child Left Behind. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 268–293. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07306545

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. Teachers College Press.

Edley, C. Jr. (2014). The National Commission on Education Excellence and Equity: Hypotheses about movement-building. New England Journal of Public Policy, 26(1), Article 6.

Equity and Excellence Commission. (2013). For every child: A strategy for education equity and excellence. U.S. Department of Education.

Jackson, C. K., Johnson, R. C., & Persico, C. (2016). The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(1), 33–68.

Milner, H. R. (2020). Disrupting punitive practices and policies: Rac(e)ing back to teaching, teacher preparation, and Brown. Equity & Excellence in Education, 53(3), 297–311.

Lampert, J., & Wilson, K. (2024). Bridging the gap: A pathway to excellence and equity in Australian schools through needs-based funding and equitable policy. The McKell Institute.

Lee, Hojung; Shores, Kenneth; Williams, Elinor: The Distribution of School Resources in the United States: A Comparative Analysis across Levels of Governance, Student Subgroups, and Educational Resources, Peabody Journal of Education, Journal Articles; Reports – Research, v97 n4 p395-411 2022.

Learning Policy Institute (LPI). (2020). The federal role in advancing education equity and excellence. Learning Policy Institute.

M. Jackson, & B. Holzman, A century of educational inequality in the United States, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117 (32) 19108-19115,

National Education Policy Center. (2026). Advancing LCFF equity and accountability. University of Colorado Boulder.

OECD. (2012). Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. OECD Publishing.

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.

Resources in the Educational Contexts of Lower- and Higher-Income Children, 1990–2014. Demography 56, 1635–1664 (2019).

Sahlberg, P. (2011). The fourth way of Finland. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 393–421. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311423185

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Alfred A. Knopf.

Valladares, M. R., Sawyer, J., & Welner, K. G. (2026). Advancing LCFF equity and accountability. National Education Policy Center.

Published

2026-05-28

How to Cite

Qalbi, A. N. ., Ardiansyah, & Anshar. (2026). Global Trends in Teacher Management: Evidence from a Global Bibliometric Systematic Review (2020–2026). Indonesian Journal of Advanced Research, 5(5), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijar.v5i5.16496

Issue

Section

Articles