The Role of Karo Customary Law in the Distribution of Inherited Property among Families Without Male Descendants in Sukadame Village, Tigapanah District

Authors

  • Icha Florensia Br Sitepu Universitas Quality Berastagi
  • Maslon Hutabalian Universitas Quality Berastagi
  • Maria Ferba Aditya Simanjuntak Universitas Quality Berastagi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ijar.v5i7.16991

Keywords:

Karo Customary Law, Inherited Property, Patrilineal System, Daughters, Living Law

Abstract

Karo customary society adheres to a patrilineal kinship system that positions sons as both the successors of the clan name and the primary heirs. This principle raises particular problems for families without male descendants, since daughters have traditionally held an unequal position within the customary inheritance structure. This article examines how Karo customary law is applied in the distribution of inherited property in families with only daughters, and analyzes its impact on families without male descendants and those without any descendants at all, focusing on Sukadame Village, Tigapanah District. A socio-legal approach with a qualitative descriptive method was employed. Data were collected through interviews with customary leaders, community members, and the village head, supported by documentary and literature study. The analysis draws on Eugen Ehrlich’s living law theory, patrilineal kinship theory, customary inheritance law theory, and legal pluralism theory. The findings show that the Sukadame community still upholds the patrilineal system as the basis for inheritance, yet its implementation is no longer rigid, as disputes are resolved through customary deliberation (musyawarah) involving the kalimbubu, senina, and anak beru. In practice, daughters in families without sons increasingly receive equal shares of inherited property, while families without any descendants pass on their estate to close relatives such as permen and bebere through family agreement. These findings confirm that Karo customary law is adaptive: it remains a living law while adjusting to demands for gender justice and the needs of modern society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barus, J. B., & Natajaya, I. N. (2022). Pembagian harta warisan bagi anak laki-laki dan perempuan berdasarkan hukum adat budaya Karo di Desa Manuk Mulia, Kecamatan Tiga Panah, Kabupaten Karo. Jurnal Media Komunikasi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 4(1), 71–79.

Ehrlich, E. (1936). Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Koentjaraningrat. (2009). Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Koesnoe, M. (1992). Hukum Adat Indonesia. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Lestari, D., & Ginting, H. (2022). Sistem kekerabatan dalam perspektif antropologi hukum di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Kebudayaan Adat Nusantara, 4(1), 45–60.

Nangka, B. (2019). Penyelesaian sengketa berdasarkan hukum waris adat berdasarkan sistem kekerabatan. Lex Privatum, 7(3).

Ningsih, W., & Arifin, Z. (2022). Dinamika asas fleksibilitas dalam hukum adat Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum, 34(1).

Pane, A., dkk. (2025). Pengaruh struktur kekerabatan Karo (kalimbubu, anak beru, senina) terhadap implementasi hukum waris. JERUMI: Journal of Education and Research in Multidisciplinary, 3(1).

Pangaribuan, E. (2024). Living law sebagai dasar pembaruan sistem hukum nasional. Jurnal Ius Quia Iustum, 31(1).

Rachelninta, N. I., & Sulastri. (2025). Implementasi hak waris perempuan dalam masyarakat adat patrilineal (studi pada suku Karo). Jurnal USM Law Review, 8(1).

Rahardjo, S. (2021). Hukum adat dan living law dalam konteks modernisasi hukum Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 51(1), 1–20.

Simbolon, M. (2023). Dinamika sistem patrilineal dalam hukum waris Batak dan Karo. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 13(1), 112–130.

Soekanto, S. (1983). Pokok-Pokok Sosiologi Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Soepomo, R. (2003). Bab-Bab tentang Hukum Adat. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Ter Haar, B. (1950). Asas-Asas dan Susunan Hukum Adat. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Tobing, F. M. (2023). Hukum adat sebagai living law dalam praktik penyelesaian sengketa sosial di Indonesia. Jurnal Rechtsvinding, 12(2), 145–162.

Van Vollenhoven, C. (1933). Het Adatrecht van Nederlandsch-Indië. Leiden: E. J. Brill.

Van Wouden, F. A. E. (1935). Types of Social Structure in Eastern Indonesia. Leiden: KITLV Press.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Pasal 18B ayat (2).

Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata (KUHPerdata).

Published

2026-07-19

How to Cite

Sitepu, I. F. B., Hutabalian, M. ., & Simanjuntak, M. F. A. . (2026). The Role of Karo Customary Law in the Distribution of Inherited Property among Families Without Male Descendants in Sukadame Village, Tigapanah District. Indonesian Journal of Advanced Research, 5(7), 1221–1228. https://doi.org/10.55927/ijar.v5i7.16991

Issue

Section

Articles