The Effect of the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) Cooperative Learning Model on Class VII Social Studies Learning Outcomes of SMP Negeri 5 Pematang Siantar T.A 2022/2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/ijar.v2i6.4713Keywords:
Numbered Heads Together, Conventional, Learning OutcomesAbstract
This study aims to look at differences in learning outcomes for class VII students of SMP Negeri 5 Pematang Siantar using the Numbered Heads Together (NHT) Koopetarof learning model from the conventional learning model. From the test results it can be stated that the quality of the questions is good because the instrument is valid where the lowest validity is 0.36 (low validity) and the highest validity is 0.53 (sufficient validity), using the product moment formula. From the results of the study, it was found that the results of the normality test with the Liliefors test found that the data on the results of the two groups were normally distributed. From the results of the class homogeneous test, it has a homogeneous variance with 0.010 > 0.05 with a = 0.01 so that Ho is rejected. From the results of the analysis of the data obtained, it is known that (1) learning outcomes using cooperative learning type numbered heads together with X̅83.87, (2) learning outcomes with conventional learning with X̅75.03. Thus it can be concluded that (1) there are differences in student learning outcomes using cooperative learning type numbered heads together with conventional learning, (2) learning outcomes using cooperative learning type numbered heads together are better than learning outcomes using conventional learning. It can be seen from the results of the average test score of students with cooperative learning type numbered heads together is higher than the average test score of students with conventional learning.
Downloads
References
Djamarah, Zain Aswan. 2016. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Hayati, Sri. 2017. Belajar &Pembelajaran Berbasis Cooperative Learning. Magelang: Graha Cendekia.
Huda, Miftahul.2015. Model-Model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta.Pustaka Belajar.
Isjoni dan Slavina. 2013. Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.
Kurniasih, I. (2015). Model Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Kata Pena.
Nisa, U. K. (2022). ANALISIS KREATIVITAS GURU TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR KOGNITIF SISWA PADA MATA PELAJARAN IPS KELAS IV SD BUDI LUHUR SEMARANG (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung).
Nugraha, R. A., Riyadi, R., & Lestari, L. (2019). Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Numbered Heads Together (NHT) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika Materi Pecahan Pada Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia): Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 5(1), 42-51.
Priansa, Juni. (2017). Pengembangan Strategi dan Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, Kreatif, dan Prestatif dalam Memahami Peserta Didik. Bandung. CV Pustaka Setia.
Ricardo., & Meilani, R. I. (2017). Impak Minat dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran. Vol.1, No.1, Hal 90. Bandung : Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Sudjana, Nana. 2013. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sudjana. 2018. Metode Statistika. Bandung : Tarsito.
Sugiyono. 2019. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung : Alphabet.
Thobroni, M. 2015. Belajar dan Pembelajaran Teori dan Praktik. Yogyakarta : AR-Ruzz Media.
Trianto. (2012). Model Pembelajaran Terpadu. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Warsono Hariyanto, 2014, Pembelajaran Aktif (Teori dan Asesmen ), Bandung, PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Yamin, M. (2013).Strategi dan Metode dalam Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Referensi (GP Press Group).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Clara Chyntia Harianja, Benjamin Albert Simamora, Binsar Tison Gultom
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.