Implementation of Marriage Rights Under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in Indonesia

Alexander Kennedy

doi:10.55927/jlca.v4i1.12895

Authors

Alexander Kennedy Universitas Pelita Harapan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/jlca.v4i1.12895

Keywords:

Interfaith Marriage, Human Rights, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Indonesia

Abstract

This research examines the compatibility of Indonesia’s marriage laws with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), emphasizing issues of equality, freedom, and non-discrimination. Article 16 of the UDHR guarantees the universal right to marry based on free and full consent, without discrimination. However, Indonesia’s legal framework, particularly the 1974 Marriage Law, reflects the nation's dualist legal approach and its emphasis on particularity, whereby international human rights norms are selectively integrated into domestic law based on cultural and religious contexts. These restrictions include barriers to interfaith marriages, exclusion of non-religious individuals, and gender inequalities perpetuated by provisions such as polygamy. While the law preserves Indonesia’s cultural and religious diversity, it often conflicts with international human rights standards, highlighting tensions between universal norms and local practices. The study employs a juridical normative approach, analyzing legal instruments, court decisions, and international treaties to evaluate Indonesia's partial alignment with UDHR principles. Findings reveal systemic gaps, including discriminatory legal barriers for interfaith couples and women, inconsistent application of administrative provisions for marriage registration, and cultural practices like child marriages that undermine equality and autonomy. The research underscores the need for comprehensive reforms to harmonize Indonesia’s marriage laws with UDHR standards.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amri, A. (2020). Perkawinan Beda Agama Menurut Hukum Positif dan Hukum Islam. Media Syari’ah, 22(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.22373/jms.v22i1.6719

Betlehn, A. (2022). Limitations on Interfaith Marriage Practices in Indonesia According to Human Rights Perspective. International Journal of Social Science And Human Research, 5(4), 1325–1331. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i4-17

Bukido, R., Gunawan, E., Usup, D., & Hayat, H. (2021). Negotiating Love and Faith: Interfaith Marriage in Manado, Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Agama dan Sosial Budaya, 6(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.15575/jw.v6i1.11299

Cantonia, S., & Majid, I. A. (2021). Juridical Review on Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia in the Perspective of Marriage Law and Human Rights. Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 2(6), 510–527. https://doi.org/10.56370/jhlg.v2i6.122

Crespin-Boucaud, J. (2020). Interethnic and Interfaith Marriages in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development, 125, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104668

Dewi, M. A. (2023). Analisis Perkawinan Beda Agama dalam Perspektif Religiusitas dan Akibat Hukumnya. Ganec Swara, 17(4), 1480–1487. https://doi.org/10.35327/gara.v17i4.632

DM, M. Y., & Saragih, G. M. (2022). Juridical Overview of the Prohibition of Interfaith Marriage from the Perspective of Human Rights and Criminal Law in Indonesia. Journal of Scientific Research, Education and Technology, 1(2), 69–82. https://doi.org/10.58526/jsret.v1i2.11

Firdaus, M. I. (2023). The Legalization of Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia (Between Universalism and Cultural Relativism). The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights, 1(2), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.58812/eslhr.v1i02.52

Fitri, D. A. (2023). Protection of Human Rights of Women in the Registration of Believers’ Marriage. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Law, Governance, and Social Justice, 205–218. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-164-7_20

Galchinsky, M. (2010). The Problem with Human Rights Culture. South Atlantic Review, 75(2), 5–18. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41635605

Hadi, F. (2022). Negara Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia di Indonesia. Wijaya Putra Law Review, 1(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.38156/wplr.v1i2.79

Hikmah, N. (2023). Impact of Constitutional Court Decision No. 24/PUU-XX/2022 Regarding Marriage as a Prerequisite for Fulfilling the Right to Have a Family and Continuing Offspring: A Socio-Legal Perspective. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Arts and Humanities 2023 (IJCAH 2023), 1423–1430. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-152-4_144

Jambak, F., Baharuddin, D., & Denasty, N. E. S. (2024). National Law and International Law in Indonesian (Between Monism or Dualism). Budi Luhur Journal of Strategic & Global Studies, 2(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.36080/jsgs.v2i1.29

Kennedy, A. (2023). Hak Asasi Manusia dan Keadilan Bermartabat: Perbandingan Teori dan Realitas di Indonesia. Ekasakti Jurnal Penelitian & Pengabdian, 4(1), 132–141. https://doi.org/10.31933/ejpp.v4i1.1043

Kennedy, A., & Wartoyo, F. X. (2024). Harmonizing Diversity: Pancasila’s Role As The Cornerstone Of Multi-cultural Harmony As Legal Discours. Global International Journal of Innovative Research, 2(4), 747–759. https://doi.org/10.59613/global.v2i4.137

Kirchschlaeger, P. G. (2020). Human Dignity and Human Rights: Fostering and Protecting Pluralism and Particularity. Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society, 6(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.30965/23642807-00601006

Maloko, M. T., Chotban, S., Fuady, M. I. N., & Hasdiwanti. (2024). Analyzing the Prohibition of Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia: Legal, Religious, and Human Rights Perspectives. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2308174

Mehmood, A., & Saeed, A. (2023). The Selection of Spouse With Free and Full Consent, A Comparison between Islam and UDHR Article 16 (A Comparative Study). Al-Irfan, 8(16), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.58932/MULB0028

Permanasari, L. (2023). Legal Analysis of Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia. Journal of Law Theory and Enforcement, 2(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.56943/jlte.v2i1.282

Perry, C. (2008). Factors Influencing Changing Religions for Marriage and The Impact Of Such a Change. California Sociology Forum, 1(1), 34–39.

Putri, N. E., Junid, K. A., & Fahmi, M. A. (2024). Marriage Between Religions Based on Human Rights Perspectives. Sapienta et Virtus, 9(1), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.37477/sev.v9i1.540

Sadi, M. I., Sobandi, H., & Suharyono, H. (2023). Politik Hukum. Kencana.

Santoso, S. (2016). Hakekat Perkawinan Menurut Undang-Undang Perkawinan, Hukum Islam dan Hukum Adat. Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum dan Hukum Islam, 7(2), 412–434. https://doi.org/10.21043/yudisia.v7i2.2162

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2024). Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Rajawali Pers.

Sundari, E., & Retnowati, A. (2024). The Fundamental Problems of Implementing Legal Pluralism of Religious in Indonesian Marriage Law and A Proposal to Reform Based on The Pure of Law Theory. International Journal of Religion, 5(11), 793–799. https://doi.org/10.61707/zpnnx947

Sundari, W., & Hayati, A. (2024). Perkawinan Beda Agama dan Implikasinya Terhadap Terbitnya Kartu Keluarga Perspektif Undang-undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 dan Undang-undang No. 23 Tahun 2006. UNES Law Review, 6(4), 10289–10298. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2002

Sunggono, B. (2019). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Rajawali Pers.

Suyanto. (2022). Metode Penelitian Hukum Pengantar Penelitian Normatif, Empiris dan Gabungan. Unigres Press.

Ukmal, D. U. (2021). Politik Reformasi Hukum: Pembentukan Sistem Hukum Nasional Yang Diharapkan. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Keadilan, 8(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.59635/jihk.v8i1.138

Verma, S. (2017). Interfaith Marriages and Negotiated Spaces. Society and Culture in South Asia, 4(1), 16–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/2393861717730620

Vundamati, R. (2021). Right to Marry and Found Family: A Most Challenged Human Right in Post Modern Era. Indian Journal of International Law, 59, 229–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40901-020-00119-8

Wardana, D. J. (2024). Overcoming Dualism: The Importance of Consolidating Law and Regulation Testing in Indonesia. Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 26(2), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v26i2.31400