Settlement of Corporate Crime with Restorative Justice Approach

Authors

  • Gydeon Irmawan Manurung University of HKBP Nommensen, Medan
  • Martono Anggusti University of HKBP Nommensen, Medan
  • July Esther University of HKBP Nommensen, Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/jlca.v4i1.13521

Keywords:

Crime, Corporate Crime, Corporate Crime Resolution, Restorative Justice

Abstract

The resolution of corporate criminal offences with a restorative justice approach is an alternative effort in resolving cases involving corporations, which does not only focus on punishment, but also on restoring relationships between the parties involved, as well as efforts to repair the negative impacts caused by the criminal act. In the corporate context, this means that companies involved in criminal offences are not only subject to legal sanctions, but are also required to take social and moral responsibility for the harm caused, both to individuals, society and the environment. This approach has the potential to improve a company's reputation, minimise long-term social impacts, and encourage more ethical and responsible corporate practices. Restorative justice also provides space for companies to make internal improvements, such as reforming policies and procedures that can prevent the recurrence of similar criminal offences in the future. Thus, the resolution of corporate criminal offences through a restorative justice approach not only provides solutions for victims and perpetrators, but also contributes to the development of a more just and sustainable law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arief Amrullah. (2006). Kejahatan Korporasi: The Hunt for Mega Profit and Attack on Democracy. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.

Arief, Barda Nawawi. Mediasi Penal: Penerapan Restorative Justice di Indonesia. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2012

Asiyah, Nur. (2017). Strategi Implementasi Perizinan dan Sanksi Administratif Sebagai Pembatasan Terhadap Kebebasan Bertindak. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan. 123-136.

Hamzah, A. (1988). Kamus Hukum. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia. Laporan Tim Analisa dan Evaluasi Hukum Tentang Pelaksanaan Asas Oportunitas Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. Diakses pada 20 Januari 2024, dari https://bphn.go.id/data/documents/pelaksanaan_asas_oportunitas_dalam_hukum_acara_pidana.

Hanum, C. (2021). Prospek keadilan restoratif dalam peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Veritas, 7(1), 3.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56196/jta.v12i01.205

Hukum online. (6 Juni 2023). Pelaksanaan Restorative Justice Terkendala Aturan Yang Belum Komprehensif. Hukumonline. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/pelaksanaan-restorative-justice- terkendala-aturan-yang-belum-komprehensif-lt648ac38d9e0a3/ (Diakses pada10 November 2024)

Ilyas, M., & Sufyan, N. (2023). Restorative Justice and Corporate Crime: The Role of Subsidiary Sanctions in Indonesia’s Legal Framework. Journal of Corporate Law and Governance, 12(3), 125-138.

Mirza Sahputra, (2022). “Restorative Justice Sebagai Wujud Hukum Progresif dalam Peraturan Perudang-Undangan di Indonesia,” Jurnal Transformasi Administrasi, 12.01.

Nugroho, M. S. (2018). Pemidanaan Korporasi Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dan Konsep Pertanggungjawabannya (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 787 K/Pid.Sus/2014). Jurnal Verstek, Vol. 5(2). Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret.

Sahbani, A. (2021). Guru besar ini jelaskan konsep keadilan restoratif dalam RKUHP. www.hukumonline.com.

Stephen A. Schiller, (1976). review of Doing Justice: The Choice of Punishments by Andrew von Hirsch, The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973–) 67, no. 3.

Suhariyanto, B. (2016). Restoratif justice dalam pemidanaan korporasi pelaku korupsi demi optimalisasi pengembalian kerugian negara (Restorative justice in sentencing corporate business optimization of corruption by country returns losses). Jurnal RechtsVinding, 5(3), December 2016.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-08

How to Cite

Manurung, G. I. ., Martono Anggusti, & July Esther. (2025). Settlement of Corporate Crime with Restorative Justice Approach. Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.55927/jlca.v4i1.13521