Legal Review of Settlement of Customary Land Disputes Through Mediation According to Positive Law

Agnes Monika Gultom; Hisar Siregar; Ria Juliana Siregar

doi:10.55927/jlca.v4i1.13656

Authors

Agnes Monika Gultom Fakultas Hukum, Universitas HKBP Nommensen, Medan
Hisar Siregar Fakultas Hukum, Universitas HKBP Nommensen, Medan
Ria Juliana Siregar Fakultas Hukum, Universitas HKBP Nommensen, Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/jlca.v4i1.13656

Keywords:

Dispute Resolution, Customary Land, Mediation, Positive Law, Batak Toba Customary Law

Abstract

Resolving customary land disputes through mediation is a relevant approach in the context of Indonesian people who have a diversity of customs and cultures. This article aims to analyze the mediation mechanism as an alternative to resolving customary land disputes within the framework of Indonesian positivist law. This study uses normative juridical methods and empirical approaches with literature and literature studies. The results of the analysis show that mediation as part of the alternative dispute resolution (ADR) system has been regulated in various laws and regulations in Indonesia, including Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation procedures in Court. In the context of customary land, mediation allows the integration of customary law values with positive law, resulting in a more accommodating and fair solution for the parties to the dispute. However, the implementation of mediation at the practical level often faces obstacles, such as differences in the interpretation of customary law and lack of understanding of mediation by the parties. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the capacity of mediators, clearer recognition of customary law and the national legal system, as well as harmonization between customary law and positive law to increase the effectiveness of resolving customary land disputes through mediation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A.M. Nugroho, “Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa: Keuntungan dan Tantangan”, Jurnal Hukum dan Masyarakat, vol. 12, no. 1 (2020): 45–60.

Boedi Harsono, dikutip dalam Dr Rosnidar Sembiring, SH.,MH “Hukum Pertanahan Adat” (2019), Hlm 13-14

Budi Santoso, “Peran Sertifikat Tanah sebagai Tanda Bukti Hak dalam Pendaftaran Tanah” (2021), Hlm 45-48

Dr. Rosnidar Sembiring, SH.,M.Hum “Hukum Pertanahan Adat” (2019) Hlm, 1-6.

Koesno, R. (2017). Integrasi Hukum Adat ke dalam Sistem Hukum Nasional: Tantangan dan Solusi. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 4(2), 145–157.

Penjelasan Undang-undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-pokok Agraria, Penjelasan umum angka 1

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (Perma) Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan

Peraturan Pemerintah No. 24 Tahun 1997 Tentang Pendaftaran Tanah

Prof. Dr. Drs. Abintoro Prakoso, S.H.,M.H, “Sejarah Hukum Agraria” (cetakan ke-1, 2021) Hlm 137-138

Samun Ismaya, Edisi Pertama “ Pengantar Hukum Sumber daya Agraria”, (2021). Hlm 224-225

Santoso, U. (2012). Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 42(4), 325–340.

Soerjono Soekanto, Pengantar Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2015); dan J. S. Badudu, Hukum Adat dan Hukum Positif (Bandung: Alumni, 2010).

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D, Bandung: Alfabeta, (2016), Hlm. 245.

Teguh Soedarsono, Penegakan Hukum Dan Putusan Peradilan Kasus-kasus Ilegal Logging, jurnal Hukum No.1 Vol. 17 Januari (2010) : Hlm. 103-118

Tumbuan, H. R. (2014). “Peran Mediasi dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Adat di Indonesia” . Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 44(3), 259–272.

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa

Urip Santoso, dikutip dari Prof. Dr.Hj.Yulia Mirwati, SH., C.N., M.H. H. yontri, S.H., SpN., Mkn “Penyewaan Tanah” (cetakan ke-1, Agustus 2021), (2023). Hlm 1-2