Implementation of the Execution of the Fiduciary Guarantee Object After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 18 PPU XVII 2019

Alko  Priadinata; Dwi Paksi  Kirana; Abdul  Azis; Harmono Harmono; Alip  Rahman

doi:10.55927/jlca.v4i2.14431

Authors

Alko Priadinata Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
Dwi Paksi Kirana Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
Abdul Azis Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
Harmono Harmono Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
Alip Rahman Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/jlca.v4i2.14431

Keywords:

Execution, Fiduciary, Collateral Asset

Abstract

This paper analyzes the application of fiduciary guarantees following the issuing of Constitutional Court Decision Number 18/PUU-XVII/2019. This ruling upholds the debtor's entitlement to legal protection against the wrongful execution of fiduciary obligations that contravene legal stipulations within the framework of Indonesian law. This research employs a normative juridical approach by examining documents and interpreting legal statutes, Constitutional Court rulings, and pertinent field activities. The study's findings indicate that, following the Constitutional Court's ruling on enforcing fiduciary assurances, numerous changes have transpired, particularly on procedural aspects and safeguarding debtors' rights. The current issues are legal ambiguity and the necessity for more comprehensive rules. This report advocates for amending regulations and enhancing law enforcement officers' capabilities to ensure the execution of fiduciary assurances aligns with legal provisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Nazia Tunisa. “Peran Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Terhadap Pengawasan Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia” JURNAL CITA HUKUM [Online], Volume 3 Number 2 (6 June 2015), h. 362

Ni Putu Sawitri Nandari, Dewa KrisnaPrasada, Kadek Julia Mahadewi, Tania, Novelin, Dewa Ayu Putri Sukadana. "Akibat Hukum Terhadap Tidak Dilakukan Penghapusan (Roya) Jaminan Fidusia Setelah Kredit Lunas", Jurnal Hukum Sasana, 2023

Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 8 tahun 2011

Peraturan Mentri Keuangan RI nomor 130/PMK 010/2012

Putu Eka Trisna Dewi, Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia: Analisis Konflik Norma dalam UU Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 18/PUU-XVII/2019

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Himpunan Peraturan Fudusia & Hak Tangggungan. Jakarta: Indonesia legal Center Publishing, 2008.

Salim, H, Perkembangan Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia, PT. RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta, 2004Sofwan, S, S.M, Hukum Jaminan di Indonesia, Pokok-Pokok Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Perorangan, Liberty, Yogyakarta, 2001

Syaifuddin, H. L., & Susilowati, I. F. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Hakim Nomor 390/Pdt. G/2018/PN Mnd Tentang Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Atas Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia Oleh Pt Sinarmas Multifinance. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, hlm.3

Taradipa, Tania. "Eksekusi jaminan fidusia terhadap debitor wanprestasi yang melakukan perlawanan pada eksekusi",Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (Indonesia),2023 Undang-Undang No. 27 Tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi (UU PDP).

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 tentang Jaminan Fidusia

Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen

Yasir, M. (2016). Aspek Hukum Jaminan Fidusia. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, 3(1).

https//kliklegal.com/putusan-mk-terkait-eksekusi-jaminan-fidusia-menambah-bebanpengadilan

https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/kpknl-bekasi/baca-artikel/12953/putusan mahkamah-konstitusi-nomor-18puu-xvii2019-apa-implikasinya-bagi-proses, diakses pada tanggal 27 April 2020.

https://www.hukumonline.com/talks/baca/lt5e295466bd93e/wanprestasi-dan.eksekusi-objek-jaminan-fidusia--best-practice-setelah-putusan-mahkamah.konstitusi-nomor-18-puu-xvii-2019/, diakses pada tanggal 04 Mei 2025.