Restoring Community Service as a Criminal Sanction in the National Criminal Code: A Juridical Analysis of an Instrument for Sentencing System Reform

Authors

  • Rikkot Gumarang Sinaga Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan
  • Debora Debora Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan
  • Ojak Nainggolan Universitas HKBP Nommensen Medan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/jlca.v5i3.14616

Keywords:

Community Service, National Criminal Code, Criminal Law Reform, Sentencing System, Social Reintegration

Abstract

Indonesia’s criminal law reform through Law Number 1 of 2023 on the Criminal Code places community service as a principal punishment in the national sentencing system. Its inclusion reflects a shift from the dominance of imprisonment toward sentencing diversification, individualization, social reintegration, and respect for human dignity. This research aims to analyze the regulation of community service as an instrument of sentencing-system reform and to examine its urgency and implications for Indonesian criminal law reform. This normative legal research employs statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches. Legal materials are analyzed qualitatively and normatively. The findings show that community service is established as a principal punishment and specifically regulated by Article 85 of Law Number 1 of 2023. Its imposition is limited by the statutory threat of imprisonment and by the sentence imposed by the judge, while requiring consideration of the defendant’s individual circumstances. The provision also regulates duration, prohibits commercialization, assigns supervision to prosecutors, and provides guidance by community counselors. Community service is urgent as an alternative to short-term imprisonment, a means of individualizing punishment, and an instrument supporting social reintegration. Its implications extend to judges, prosecutors, community counselors, and the social environment in which the sentence is carried out. Community service therefore constitutes an important instrument of Indonesian sentencing-system reform, although its effectiveness depends on normative certainty and implementation capacity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahimsya, Moh Galih Raka Siwi. “Efektivitas Pidana Kerja Sosial dan Pidana Pengawasan Sebagai Alternatif Penjara Jangka Pendek dalam KUHP Nasional.” Jurnal Hukum Inklusi Indonesia 1, no. 1 (2026).

Irmawanti, Noveria Devy, dan Barda Nawawi Arief. “Urgensi Tujuan Dan Pedoman Pemidanaan Dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 3, no. 2 (2021): 217–227. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i2.217-227.

Khomaini. “Implementasi Pidana Kerja Sosial dalam KUHP Nasional sebagai Solusi Overkapasitas Lembaga Pemasyarakatan: Tantangan dan Model Sinergi Tripartit.” Law Jurnal 7, no. 1 (2026). https://doi.org/10.46576/lj.v7i1.9606.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2023 Nomor 1, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6842.

Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemasyarakatan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2022 Nomor 165, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6811.

Sugiharto, Gatot. “Relevansi Kebijakan Penetapan Pidana Kerja Sosial dalam Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Novelty 7, no. 1 (2016): 83–95. https://doi.org/10.26555/novelty.v7i3.a3936.

United Nations General Assembly. United Nations Standard Minimum Rules for Non-custodial Measures (The Tokyo Rules). Resolution 45/110, 14 December 1990.

Wicaksana, Villar Wibawa, dan Mas Putra Zenno Januarsyah. “Kebijakan Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Tentang Pidana Kerja Sosial Dalam KUHP Nasional: Perspektif Tujuan Pemidanaan.” Jurnal USM Law Review 8, no. 2 (2025): 709–728. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v8i2.11092.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-23

How to Cite

Sinaga, R. G., Debora, D., & Nainggolan, O. (2026). Restoring Community Service as a Criminal Sanction in the National Criminal Code: A Juridical Analysis of an Instrument for Sentencing System Reform. Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics , 5(3), 473–484. https://doi.org/10.55927/jlca.v5i3.14616

Issue

Section

Articles