Legal Certainty and the Harmonization of the Principle of Prudence: A Reconstruction of Bank Compliance Parameters in the Discourse on the Business Judgment Rule
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/jlca.v5i1.16373Keywords:
Prudential Banking Principle, Legal Certainty, Business Judgment Rule, Banking CriminalizationAbstract
The banking sector plays a crucial role in national economic development and must operate in accordance with prudential banking principles. However, legal uncertainty arises due to the clash of norms between the regulations governing the Board of Directors' duties under Law No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (UU PT) and criminal liability under Law No. 10 of 1998 concerning Banking. This research aims to analyze the harmonization of these regulations and propose a reconstruction of prudential parameters to avoid the criminalization of business risks. The research adopts a normative legal method, and findings indicate that the lack of clear "compliance steps" parameters creates disparity in court rulings. The discretion granted to businesses under the Business Judgment Rule doctrine is sometimes misinterpreted, leading to criminal implications. The study recommends reinforcing the role of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) by instituting a Cease and Desist Order as a precondition for criminal law enforcement in compliance matters.
Downloads
References
Arief, B. N. (2002). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Citra Aditya Bakti. Barda Nawawi Arief. (2018). Masalah penegakan hukum dan kebijakan hukum pidana dalam penanggulangan kejahatan. Prenada Media.
Barlian, A. E. A., & Arief, B. N. (2017). Formulasi Ide Permaafan Hakim (RECHTERLIJK PARDON) dalam Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan di Indonesia. Law Reform, 13(1), 28–44.
Erdiana, E. (2023). Kepastian Hukum terhadap Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Perbankan (Prudential Banking Principle) dalam Operasional Perbankan.
Syntax Literate; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 8(10), 5774–5787.
Fitriani, D. (2020). Perlindungan direksi melalui business judgment rule. Al- Muamalat Jurnal Hukum Dan Ekonomi Syariah, 5(2), 70–87.
Hadjon, P. M. (2003). Penelitian hukum normatif. Kumpulan Tulisan, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga.
Julyano, M., & Sulistyawan, A. Y. (2019). Pemahaman Terhadap Asas Kepastian Hukum Melalui Konstruksi Penalaran Positivisme Hukum. CREPIDO, 1(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.14710/crepido.1.1.13-22
Koto, I., Hanifah, I., Perdana, S., & Nadirah, I. (2023). Perlindungan Hukum Atas Kekayaan Intelektual Perspektif Hukum Islam. Jurnal Yuridis, 10(2), 66–73.
Otorisasi Jasa Keuangan. (2022). Laporan Tahunan OJK 2022. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/data-dan-statistik/laporan- tahunan/Pages/Laporan-Tahunan-OJK-2022.aspx
Purwogandi, B. (2023). Rekonstruksi regulasi penegakan hukum dalam upaya penanggulangan tindak pidana perbankan yang berkeadilan. UNIVERSITAS ISLAM SULTAN AGUNG.
Radbruch, G. (1932). Legal philosophy.
Sembiring, S. (2000). Hukum Perbankan. Mandar Maju.
Sinaga, N. F., Nadirah, I., & Pohan, M. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Nasabah Bank Yang Menerima Kerugian Akibat Kesalahan Transfer Dana. Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 6(2), 640–649.
Sjahdeini, S. R. (2018). Perbankan Syariah: Produk-produk dan aspek-aspek hukumnya. Kencana.
Soekanto, S. (2006). Pengantar penelitian hukum. Penerbit Universitas Indonesia (UI-Press).
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2004). Penelitian Hukum Normatif, Cetakan ke-8, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.
Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perbankan (1998). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/45486/uu-no-10-tahun-1998
Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas (2007). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/39965
Van Hoecke, M., & Gijssels, J. (1982). Wat is rechtstheorie? KluwerRechtswetenschappen.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Rizki Pratama, Ida Nadirah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
