Reformulation of the Cessie Regulations in Indonesian Banking Law in Order to Close the Legal Vacuum and Realize Balanced Legal Protection

Yudhistira Dhi Djajaram; Richard Richard

doi:10.55927/jlca.v5i2.16632

Authors

Yudhistira Dhi Djajaram Universitas Borobudur Jakarta
Richard Richard Universitas Borobudur Jakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/jlca.v5i2.16632

Keywords:

Cessie, Banking, Legal Vacuum, Legal Protection

Abstract

This study analyzes the legal vacuum in the regulation of cessie within Indonesian banking practices and formulates a legal reform model to achieve balanced legal certainty and protection. Using normative juridical research with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study examines Article 613, Article 1320, and Article 1338 of the Indonesian Civil Code, Law Number 10 of 1998 concerning Banking, and Law Number 21 of 2011 concerning the Financial Services Authority. The findings reveal that existing cessie regulations remain general and are unable to accommodate the complexity of modern banking transactions, resulting in legal uncertainty and insufficient debtor protection. The absence of specific rules governing transfer procedures, debtor rights, and supervisory mechanisms creates opportunities for abuse and imbalance between creditors and debtors. Therefore, legal reform is necessary through the establishment of more comprehensive banking-specific regulations, strengthened debtor notification requirements, enhanced debtor protection, and more effective regulatory supervision. Such reform is expected to provide greater legal certainty, justice, and balance in Indonesian banking practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Faturachman, F. A., Hutasoit, T. J. E., & Hosnah, A. U. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban dan penegakan hukum pidana korporasi dalam tindak pidana korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis, 4(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v4i2.731

Khalifah, N., & Sari, A. (2023). Criminal liability for corporate crime in Indonesia. Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 5(1), 867–874. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v5i1.2687

Mahmud, A. (2022). Urgensi dan sistem pertanggungjawaban korporasi sebagai pelaku tindak pidana korupsi. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia Fakultas Hukum Universitas Suryakancana, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v8i1.2085

Maksum, U., Saptomo, A., & Borobudur, U. (2024). A clean public procurement system through commitment making officials (PPK) criminal liability reforms. Edunity, 3(11), 1064–1081. https://doi.org/10.57096/edunity.v3i11.335

Muladi, D. P. (2010). Pertanggung jawaban pidana korporasi. Kencana.

Noor, A. (2025). Ultimum remedium dalam penegakan hukum korupsi pengadaan di perusahaan BUMN dibidang kontruksi. Bulletin of Law Research, 2(2), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.65344/bleach.v2i2.133

Nozimakhon, S., & Kizi, M. (2023). General principles of corporate liability for corruption. American Journal of Political Science, Law and Criminology, 5(8), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.37547/tajpslc/volume05issue08-12

Nur, A. K. (2021). Concept of criminal law on corruption of corporate criminal liability system based on justice value. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 4(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v4i1.14205

OECD Anti-Corruption. (2015). Liability of legal persons for corruption in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. OECD Publishing.

OECD Anti-Corruption. (2022). OECD review of the corporate governance of state-owned enterprises in Viet Nam. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a22345d0-en

Panggabean, M. L. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban korporasi dalam hukum pidana: Kajian putusan No. 1405 K/Pid.Sus/2013. [Publisher not specified].

Parintak, S. (2023). Uncovering hidden realities: A phenomenological approach to financial crime in public procurement. Journal of International Conference Proceedings, 6(7), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.32535/jicp.v6i7.2794

Pieth, M., & Ivory, R. (2012). Corporate criminal liability. In General reports of the XVIIIth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law/Rapports généraux du XVIIIème Congrès de l’Académie Internationale de Droit Comparé (pp. 625–655). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2354-2_28

Prabowo, D., Saragih, Y. M., Hadi, M. F., Emri, S. I., Romolus, K., & Sianipar, D. (2025). Implementation of corporate criminal accountability in Indonesian national economic crime. JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.55606/jurrish.v4i3.5998

Rusyana, E., & Saputera, J. A. (2024). Criminal liability in the perspective of corporations’ crimes. Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains, 5(9), 2245–2254. https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v5i09.1375

Saragih, H. Y., Chandra, T. Y., & P. Handa, S. T. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi pelaku tindak pidana korupsi dalam tata kelola niaga komoditas di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 2(8), 3705–3717. https://doi.org/10.62335/sinergi.v2i8.1639

Taufik, A., Suhartono, S., & Mangesti, Y. A. (2023). Criminal accountability of state owned enterprises in criminal acts of corruption. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 44, Article 8968. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v44i1.8968

Yunus, R., Moonti, R. M., Martam, N. K., Kasim, M. A., & Hukum, U. G. (2025). Analisis penegakan hukum pidana terhadap kejahatan korporasi. Mahkamah: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.62383/mahkamah.v2i3.660

Zulfiani, A. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam korupsi pengadaan barang dan jasa konstruksi. Justicia Sains: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8(2), 544–558. https://doi.org/10.24