Labor Rights in the Era of the Gig Economy: Regulatory Challenges and Legal Protection in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/jlca.v5i2.16687Keywords:
Labor Rights, Gig Economy, Digital Workers, Labor Regulation, Legal ProtectionAbstract
The rapid growth of the gig economy has transformed labor relations in Indonesia through digital platform-based work arrangements. While gig work offers flexibility and employment opportunities, it also creates legal uncertainty regarding workers’ status and limits access to fundamental labor protections. This study aims to analyze the legal status of gig workers within Indonesia’s labor law system and identify regulatory challenges in ensuring fair legal protection. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches supported by primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The findings reveal that existing labor regulations remain oriented toward conventional employment relationships and fail to accommodate platform-mediated work. As a result, gig workers occupy a legal grey area, restricting their access to minimum wage protection, social security, and safeguards against unilateral termination. The study recommends regulatory reform recognizing new employment relationships and establishing a specific legal framework for gig workers.
Downloads
References
Collins, H., Ewing, K. D., & McColgan, A. (2019). Labour law (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the “just-in-time workforce”: On-demand work, crowd work, and labor protection in the gig economy. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37(3), 471–504.
Gaol, C. P. L., Nugroho, B. E., Sumarna, D., & Rahman, I. (2026). The urgency of sufficient work regulations as social protection for gig workers. Jurnal Smart Hukum.
Hutchinson, T. (2010). Researching and writing in law (3rd ed.). Lawbook Co.
Iqbal, M. A. S. N., Rokhim, A., & Utami, N. S. (2024). Legal protection for workers gig economy in the platform economy era. International Journal of Cultural and Social Science.
Izzati, N. R., & Kwang, E. N. (2023). Regulating platform work in Indonesia: Exploring legal options for workers’ protection. Jurnal Ketenagakerjaan.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum (Rev. ed.). Kencana Prenada Media Group.
McConville, M., & Chui, W. H. (2017). Research methods for law. Edinburgh University Press.
Prassl, J., & Risak, M. (2016). Uber, TaskRabbit, and co.: Platforms as employers? International Labour Review, 155(3), 619–651.
Setiawan, A. H., Sunandar, F. N., Juaeni, A., & Triestanto, J. (2024). Analysis of digital employment contracts on gig economy platforms: Between flexibility and exploitation. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice.
Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2001). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Stevania, M., & Hoesin, S. H. (2024). Legal certainty of employment social security for gig workers in Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum, 11(2), 268–277.
Wardhana, A. P. K., & Rasji. (2026). The legal status of gig economy workers in Indonesia’s digital platform industry (2022–2025). Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review.
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: Autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33(1), 56–75.
World Bank. (2023). Online gig work and labor protection challenges.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Melti Wulandari, Susanto, Edi Sofwan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





























