The Inability to Take Responsibility of Paranoid Schizophrenic Criminal Perpetrators and Its Implications for the Protection of Victims' Rights from the Pancasila Perspective

Authors

  • Sri Budi Raharjo Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
  • Hartiwiningsih Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta
  • Ismunarno Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/jlca.v5i2.16689

Keywords:

Paranoid Schizophrenia, Protection Of Victims' Rights, Pancasila

Abstract

Criminal acts committed by individuals with paranoid schizophrenia present significant challenges within the criminal justice system. Due to their mental condition, offenders are often considered incapable of criminal responsibility and are directed toward medical rehabilitation rather than criminal punishment. Consequently, victims’ rights, including compensation, psychological recovery, and access to justice, are frequently overlooked. This study aims to analyze the implications of the offender’s inability to assume criminal responsibility on the protection of victims’ rights from the perspective of Pancasila. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and philosophical approaches. Primary legal materials include the Criminal Code, the Health Law, and the Human Rights Law, supported by relevant literature and legal doctrines. The findings indicate that existing legal regulations place greater emphasis on offender rehabilitation, resulting in inadequate protection of victims’ rights. From the perspective of Pancasila, particularly the principles of Just and Civilized Humanity and Social Justice for All Indonesian People, victim protection constitutes an essential element of justice and human dignity. Therefore, criminal law reform is required to balance offender rehabilitation with victim protection through compensation mechanisms, restorative justice, and stronger institutional coordination, thereby creating a more equitable criminal justice system based on Pancasila values.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hamamah, Fatin. "The Government's Responsibility in Providing Compensation and Restitution in the Perspective of the Legal Theory of Dignified Justice." SASI 29, no. 4 (2023): 616-622.

Hutabarat, Rugun Romaida. “Criminal Sanction Reduction Policy: Mental and Intellectual Disabilities Review from the Purpose of Punishment.” Jurnal Dinamika Hukum (2024)

Najib, Ahmad Ainun, and Putri Ayu Sutrisno. "Reactualization of Pancasila as a Source of Indonesian Law in Realizing Justice." IJMRA: An International Journal of Multidisciplinery and Analysis 7, no. 5 (2024): 1935-1940.

Putri, Adellia Eddiesa, and Bambang Waluyo. "Criminal Responsibility For Perpetrators of Criminal Acts With Schizophrenic Mental Disorders." Journal of Law, Politics and Humanities 4, no. 4 (2024): 1058-1066.

Raihan, Alief, Hatarto Pakpahan Setiyono, and Hatarto Pakpahan. "Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana yang Memiliki Indikasi Schizophrenia." Bhirawa Law Journal 3, no. 1 (2022): 42-50.

Syah, Benny Elfian, and Didik Endro Purwoleksono. "Ius Constituendum Restorative Justice in Indonesia." Media Iuris 6, no. 3 (2023).

Tedjokusumo, Dave David dan Carissa Amanda Siswanto. “Reformasi Hukum Pidana dalam Tanggung Jawab Pidana bagi Orang dengan Gangguan Mental yang Berorientasi pada Keadilan yang Bermartabat.” JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW (2023)

Undang-undang Nomor 1 tahun 2023

Yunara, Edi, and Taufik Kemas. "The role of victimology in the protection of crime victims in Indonesian criminal justice system." Mahadi: Indonesia Journal of Law 3, no. 01 (2024): 63-78.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-31

How to Cite

Raharjo, S. B. ., Hartiwiningsih, & Ismunarno. (2026). The Inability to Take Responsibility of Paranoid Schizophrenic Criminal Perpetrators and Its Implications for the Protection of Victims’ Rights from the Pancasila Perspective. Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics, 5(2), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.55927/jlca.v5i2.16689

Issue

Section

Articles