Juridical Analysis of Interim Decisions in Cases of Embezzlement in Office: Case Study of Decision Number 664/Pid.B/2013/PN.Jkt.Sel.

Nafis Dwi Kartiko

doi:10.55927/jlca.v3i1.8112

Authors

Nafis Dwi Kartiko Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Pelita Harapan Kampus Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/jlca.v3i1.8112

Keywords:

Criminal Acts, Committed by Children, Cyberspace

Abstract

This research focuses on the juridical analysis of interlocutory decisions in cases of embezzlement in office, with a case study of RD. Yudi Suyud Indriardi and PT Employee Cooperative. Indonesian post. Existing studies generally take a normative approach to the regulation of legal processes, but are still limited in providing analysis of the application of these laws in actual judicial practice. This research aims to fill this gap by providing a more concrete analysis and possible solutions to the inconsistencies that exist in interlocutory decisions. The research method used is a normative juridical approach using primary and secondary legal materials. In-depth and focused research on cases such as RD Yudi Suyud Indriardi will produce new insights regarding the application of Article 143 of the Criminal Procedure Code which aims to strengthen the legal basis of judges' decisions and guarantee the rights of defendants. This research makes a significant contribution to theoretical understanding and practical application in the justice system. By examining cases and court decisions, this research contributes to the enrichment of existing legal literature by providing an in-depth analysis of the extent to which judges' considerations influence the validity and quality of decisions. From a practical perspective, this research demonstrates the need for precision in the writing and formulation of indictments and judge's decisions, which must meet the standards set by law. This research also emphasizes the importance of better understanding of Article 143 of the Criminal Procedure Code among legal practitioners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aini, F. H. (2016). Urgensi Pembelajaran Ekonomi Cukup Berwawasan Pasal 33 Ayat (1) UUD 1945 pada Sekolah Menengah Atas. National Conference On Economic Education.

Amran, S. (2021). Filsafat Koperasi Dalam Penguatan Hukum Koperasi Di Indonesia.

Hamzah, A. (2016). Surat Dakwaan Dalam Hukum Acara Pidana. Alumni, Bandung.

Huda, M. C. (2021). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Pendekatan Yuridis Sosiologis). The Mahfud Ridwan Institute.

Kader, M. A. (2018). Peran UKM dan koperasi dalam mewujudkan ekonomi kerakyatan di Indonesia. JURISMA: Jurnal Riset Bisnis & Manajemen, 8(1), 15–32.

Kusumastuti, D., & MP, S. M. S. P. (2022). Peran koperasi dalam memajukan perekonomian di Indonesia. Unisri Press.

Manan, A. (2014). Peranan hukum dalam pembangunan ekonomi. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Nurahmani, A., Rismansyah, M. R., & Suciati, P. N. (2018). Reorientasi Perekonomian Nasional Berdasarkan Pancasila Melalui Perubahan Pasal 33 Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 dengan Model Directive Principles of State Policies. Majalah Hukum Nasional, 48(2), 139–165.

Pulungan, M. S. (2019). Konsepsi Bangun Perusahaan Koperasi: Kerangka Pemikiran Badan Usaha Yang Ideal Menurut Pasal 33 Ayat (1) UUD 1945. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 49(2), 241–264.

Sulistyawan, A. Y., & Atmaja, A. F. P. (2021). Arti Penting Legal Reasoning Bagi Hakim Dalam Pengambilan Putusandi Pengadilan Untuk Menghindari Onvoldoende Gemotiveerd. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 6(2), 482–496.

Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana.

Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Umum.

Undang-Undang Nomor 25 tahun 1992 tentang Perkoperasian.

Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.

Undang-undang Nomor 49 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 1986 Tentang Peradilan Umum.