Moderating Role of MSME Collaboration on Digital Innovation Toward Adaptive Capability and MSME Performance in Indonesia

Antonius Ary Setyawan; Endang Setyawati; Jaluanto Sunu Punjul Tyoso

doi:10.55927/ministal.v4i4.15832

Authors

Antonius Ary Setyawan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komputer Yos Sudarso
Endang Setyawati Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Komputer Yos Sudarso
Jaluanto Sunu Punjul Tyoso Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Semarang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ministal.v4i4.15832

Keywords:

Digital Innovation, Digital Adaptive Capability, MSME Collaboration, MSME Performance

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of digital innovation on MSME performance in Indonesia, focusing on the mediating role of digital adaptive capability and the moderating effect of MSME collaboration. Drawing on the Dynamic Capabilities Theory, a structural equation model was developed and tested using data from 100 MSMEs across various sectors. The results indicate that digital innovation has a significant direct effect on performance and also enhances adaptive capability. However, adaptive capability itself does not significantly influence performance, suggesting it may require complementary factors to be effective. Contrary to expectations, MSME collaboration did not moderate the effects of innovation or adaptive capability on performance, implying that collaboration must be strategically aligned to be beneficial. The findings highlight the need for MSMEs to focus on internal digital readiness while being cautious about over-relying on external partnerships. The study contributes to the digital transformation literature in emerging economies and provides practical guidance for MSME policy and strategy. Future research is recommended to use longitudinal data and explore additional moderators or mediators in the innovation–performance relationship.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, Z., AlWadi, B. M., Kumar, H., Ng, B.-K., & Nguyen, D. N. (2024). Digital transformation of family-owned small businesses: A nexus of internet entrepreneurial self-efficacy, artificial intelligence usage and strategic agility. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-10-2023-2205

Al Issa, H.-E., & Omar, M. M. S. (2024). Digital innovation drivers in retail banking: The role of leadership, culture, and technostress inhibitors. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 32(11), 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-08-2023-3905

Awang, A. H., Mohd Sapie, N., Hussain, M. Y., Ishak, S., & Md Yusof, R. (2019). Nurturing innovative employees: Effects of organisational learning and work environment. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 1152–1168. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1592007

Baral, M., Mukherjee, S., Nagariya, R., Singh Patel, B., Pathak, A., & Chittipaka, V. (2023). Analysis of factors impacting firm performance of MSMEs: Lessons learnt from COVID-19. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 30(6), 1942–1965. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-11-2021-0660

Bogers, M., Chesbrough, H., & Moedas, C. (2018). Open Innovation: Research, Practices, and Policies. California Management Review, 60(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617745086

Brewis, C., Dibb, S., & Meadows, M. (2023). Leveraging big data for strategic marketing: A dynamic capabilities model for incumbent firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 190, 122402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122402

Cenamor, J., Parida, V., & Wincent, J. (2019). How entrepreneurial SMEs compete through digital platforms: The roles of digital platform capability, network capability and ambidexterity. Journal of Business Research, 100, 196–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.035

Charband, Y., & Jafari Navimipour, N. (2016). Online knowledge sharing mechanisms: A systematic review of the state of the art literature and recommendations for future research. Information Systems Frontiers, 18(6), 1131–1151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-016-9628-z

Collazos, A., Albarracin, E. J., Vera-Jaramillo, F., & Patiño-Giraldo, L. V. (2025). Digitalization, innovation, sustainability and performance: A causal analysis applied to tourism MSMEs. International Journal of Innovation Studies, 9(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2024.12.001

Dwivedi, Y. K., Ismagilova, E., Hughes, D. L., Carlson, J., Filieri, R., Jacobson, J., Jain, V., Karjaluoto, H., Kefi, H., Krishen, A. S., Kumar, V., Rahman, M. M., Raman, R., Rauschnabel, P. A., Rowley, J., Salo, J., Tran, G. A., & Wang, Y. (2021). Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168

Ellström, D., Holtström, J., Berg, E., & Josefsson, C. (2022). Dynamic capabilities for digital transformation. Journal of Strategy and Management, 15(2), 272–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-04-2021-0089

Emory University, Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., University of Southern California, Pavlou, P. A., Temple University, Venkatraman, N., & Boston University. (2013). Digital Business Strategy: Toward a Next Generation of Insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37:2.3

Forkmann, S., Webb, J., Henneberg, S. C., & Scheer, L. K. (2022). Boundary spanner corruption: A potential dark side of multi-level trust in marketing relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 50(5), 889–914. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-022-00844-z

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980

Godey, B., Manthiou, A., Pederzoli, D., Rokka, J., Aiello, G., Donvito, R., & Singh, R. (2016). Social media marketing efforts of luxury brands: Influence on brand equity and consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5833–5841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.181

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (Third edition). SAGE.

Hair, J., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & G. Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

Hasanah, Y. N., Anggraeni, O., . S., Kusnaman, D., Hasibuan, R. R., & Efendi, B. (2025). Entrepreneurial Marketing and Marketing Performance in Gen Z Entrepreneurs: Exploring the Mediating Pathways to Entrepreneurial Resilience. Journal of Ecohumanism, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v4i1.6195

Hasibuan, R. R. (2024). DAMPAK PERSONAL BRANDING DAN INFLUENCER MARKETING TERHADAP KEPUTUSAN PEMBELIAN KONSUMEN GENERASI Z. 3(2).

Hasibuan, R. R., Darmawan, A. R., Afifah, H., Permana, I. S., Masrokhah, S., Suciningtyas, S., & Sumaya, P. S. (2024). PEMANFAAT MEDIA SOSIAL DALAM PEMASARAN PRODUK UMKM DI KABUPATEN BANYUMAS. 2(2).

Helfat, C., & Peteraf, M. A. (2009). Understanding dynamic capabilities: Progress along a developmental path. Strategic Organization, 7(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127008100133

Kumar, & Pansari, A. (2016). Competitive Advantage through Engagement. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(4), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.15.0044

Lee Brown, D., Guidry, R. P., & Patten, D. M. (2009). Sustainability reporting and perceptions of corporate reputation: An analysis using fortune. In M. Freedman & B. Jaggi (Eds.), Advances in Environmental Accounting & Management (Vol. 4, pp. 83–104). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3598(2010)0000004007

Maglaras, G., Bourlakis, M., & Fotopoulos, C. (2015). Power-imbalanced relationships in the dyadic food chain: An empirical investigation of retailers’ commercial practices with suppliers. Industrial Marketing Management, 48, 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.03.014

Molina-Castillo, F.-J., Rodríguez, R., López-Nicolas, C., & Bouwman, H. (2022). The role of ERP in business model innovation: Impetus or impediment. Digital Business, 2(2), 100024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100024

Molla, A., & Licker, P. S. (2005). eCommerce adoption in developing countries: A model and instrument. Information & Management, 42(6), 877–899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.09.002

Muafi, Sanusi, Z. M., & Roostika, R. (2023). Digital Skills, Digital Entrepreneurship, Job Satisfaction, and Sustainable Performance of MSMEs: A Survey on MSMEs in Indonesia. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(2), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180215

Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242. https://doi.org/10.2307/259373

Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254

Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of past Research and Suggestions for the Future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00308.x

Sifolo, S. (2023). Digital Technology Adaptability: Insights from Destination Network Practices for Tourism Businesses in South Africa. Tourism and Leisure, 12.

Teece. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

Teece. (2016). Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Agility: Risk, Uncertainty, and Strategy in the Innovation Economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13

Teece, D. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

Warner, K. S. R., & Wäger, M. (2019). Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal. Long Range Planning, 52(3), 326–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.12.001