Ethical Conflicts between Patient Autonomy and Physician Centered Paternalism: An Account of Justified Paternalism

Abhijit  Tarafdar

doi:10.55927/ajpr.v4i1.14140

Authors

Abhijit Tarafdar Presidency University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ajpr.v4i1.14140

Keywords:

Paternalism, Patient autonomy, Liberty, Patients’ right, Doctor- patient relationship

Abstract

This paper critically analyzes the ethical tension between patient autonomy and physician based paternalism within the doctor–patient relationship. The core problem lies in the asymmetry of medical knowledge, which has long been used as a tool to justify paternalistic interventions by physicians. Paternalistic interference breeds many moral questions from the perspective of patient autonomy and liberty and it inevitably creates ethical issues in doctor- patient relationship in the past few decades. With the advent of medical technology and awareness of patient autonomy, liberty, patients’ right, many critics have started to inveigh against the domination of physicians and give emphasize on patient autonomy bestowing all the responsibilities upon the patients in medical setting. There is also another view regarding the authority of medical decision making which tries to combine the part of liberty or patient autonomy with a soft or lesser degree of physician centered paternalism. This paper explores this ethical conflict and defends a model of limited medical paternalism that supports rather than undermines patient autonomy, demonstrating their potential compatibility in modern healthcare.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arneson, R. J. (1980). Mill versus paternalism. Ethics, 90, 471-479.

Blumer, I. (1999). What your doctor really thinks: Diagnosing the doctor-patient relationship. Oxford: Hounslow Book.

Dworkin, G. (1972). Paternalism. The Monist, 56, 64-84.

Feinberg, J. (1986). Harm to self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Gert, B., & Culver, C. M. (1976). Paternalistic behaviour. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6, 45-47.

Gert, B., & Culver, C. M. (1979). The justification of paternalism. Ethics, 89, 199-210.

Kant, I. (1958). Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals. New York: Harper and Row.

Komrad, M. S. (1983). A defence of medical paternalism: Maximising patients’ autonomy. Journal of Medical Ethics, 9(1), 38–44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27716131

Parsons, T. (1951). Definition of health and illness in the light of American values and social structure. New York: Free Press.

Pellegrino, E. (1979). Toward a reconstruction of medical morality: The primacy of the act of profession and the fact of illness. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 4, 32-56.

Rawls, J. (1979). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Siegler, M. (1981). Searching for moral certainty in medicines: A proposal for a new model of the doctor-patient encounter. Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 57, 85.