Wilhelm Dilthey's Thoughts on Understanding, Hermeneutics and Communication

Authors

  • Fendy Financy Universitas Pelita Harapan
  • Fitzerald Kennedy Sitorus Universitas Pelita Harapan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/ajpr.v3i1.9360

Keywords:

Hermeneutika, Erlebnis, Ausdruck, Verstehen, Wilhelm Dilthey

Abstract

Wilhelm Dilthey, a towering figure in the realm of philosophy, dedicated his life's work to unravelling the complexities of human experience. Dilthey believed that life is not merely a series of random events, but a tapestry woven from these experiences, which collectively influence our perspectives and sense of being. By examining Dilthey's thoughts on communication as a process of shared knowledge and meaning making, we gain valuable insights into how we bridge the gap between different perspectives and forge deeper connections. Through a quantitative approach and literature review Dilthey's perspectives are analyzed. Dilthey believed a text goes beyond its literal meaning; it symbolizes deeper significance. Understanding the true depth of a symbol requires venturing beyond its surface meaning and delving into its historical context. Symbols are not merely arbitrary signs; they are often imbued with layers of meaning accumulated over time. These layers reflect the cultural, social, and political landscapes from which the symbol emerged. To fully grasp the symbolic meaning, then, requires an exploration of its historical journey.  Despite the occasional inclusion of natural science objects in humanities, Dilthey saw a clear distinction between the two. He saw understanding as a process of grasping the intended meaning rooted in life experiences. Therefore, Dilthey's concept of meaning is historical highlighting the significance of personal and collective life experiences in interpretation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Apel, K.-O. (1982). Transformation of the Hermeneutic Tradition. Northwestern University Press.

Apel, K.-O., & Krois, J. M. (1987). Dilthey’s Distinction Between “Explanation” and “Understanding” and the Possibility of Its “Mediation.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 25(1), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1353/hph.1987.0009

Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. E. (Eds.). (1986). Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography. University of California Press.

Cooper, H. R. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Jauss, H. R. (1982). Toward a Theory of Reception. University of Minnesota Press.

Misgeld, D. (2008). Dilthey and the Possibility of Historical Understanding. Stanford University Press.

Nelson, E. S. (2019). Introduction: Wilhelm Dilthey in Context. In Interpreting Dilthey (pp. 1–18). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316459447.001

Palmer, R. E. (1963). Hermeneutics: Interpretation Theory in Schleiermacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. Northwestern University Press.

Palmer, R. E. (2003). Hermeneutika: teori baru mengenai interpretasi, Terj. Pustaka Pelajar

Palmer, Richard E. 2005. Hermeneutics Interpretation Theory in Schleirmacher, Dilthey, Heidegger, and Gadamer. (Terjemahan dalam bahasa Indonesia Oleh Musnur

R. Priyanto. 1998. Perkembangan Hermeneutika (Seni Interpretasi): Dari Praktik Penemuan Hukum Menjadi Metode Human Studies.

Ricoeur, Paul. 1991. From Text to Action: Essays in Hermeneutics, II. Illionis:Northwestern University Press.

Verschueren, J. (2019). Ideology in Language Use. Oxford University Press

Downloads

Published

2024-04-29

How to Cite

Financy, F., & Fitzerald Kennedy Sitorus. (2024). Wilhelm Dilthey’s Thoughts on Understanding, Hermeneutics and Communication. Asian Journal of Philosophy and Religion, 3(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.55927/ajpr.v3i1.9360

Issue

Section

Articles