The Influence of Learning Environment, Lecturer Knowledge, and Personal Initiative on Learning Process and Graduate Quality: a Structural Equation Modeling Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v3i11.11963Keywords:
Learning Environment, Lecturer Knowledge, Personal Initiative, Learning Process, Graduate QualityAbstract
This study aims to analyze the influence of the learning environment, lecturer knowledge, and personal initiative on the learning process and graduate quality in higher education institutions. The methodology employed is Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) to test the relationships among these variables. The results indicate that a conducive learning environment and adequate lecturer knowledge significantly contribute to the learning process. Additionally, students’ personal initiative also positively impacts graduate quality. These findings provide essential insights for educational managers to create a better learning environment and enhance teaching quality in efforts to improve graduate outcomes.
References
Abidin, Z., Riyad, M., & Ali, A. N. (2022). Hubungan antara kepribadian dengan engagement dosen di Institut Ummul Quro Al Islami (Iuqi) Bogor. 6(2), 152-165.
Aboytes, J. R. (2020). Transformative learning in the field of sustainability: a systematic literature review (1999-2019). International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 21(5), 993-1013.
Anggraeni, R. D. (2014). Increasing lecturer competence as the quality assurance of lecturer performance. Management Studies, 2(5), 309-329.
Baldwin, C. (2021). Autoethnographic Dance and Transformative Learning: Exploring Self-Reflexive Identity Work and Change. Journal of Transformative Education, 19(2), 107-126.
Bem, R. M., Coelho, C. C., & Dandolini, G. A. (2016). Knowledge management framework to the university libraries. Library Management, 37(4).
Ben Ouahi, M., Lamri, D., Hassouni, T., & Al Ibrahmi, E. M. (2022). Science Teachers' Views on the Use and Effectiveness of Interactive Simulations in Science Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1).
Cancino, M., & Capredoni, R. (2020). Assessing pre-service EFL teachers' perceptions regarding an online student response system. Taiwan Journal of TESOL, 17(2), 91-118.
Chukwuere, J. E. (2024). The future of generative AI chatbots in higher education. Computers and Society.
Fauzi, R. A., & Asri, Y. (2021). Barriers and solutions in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic, Indonesian language education students at the Riau Islamic University. In Ninth International Conference on Language and Arts (ICLA 2020), 14-18.
Feng, Y., & Hancock, G. R. (2024). A structural equation modeling approach for modeling variability as a latent variable. Psychological Methods, 29(2), 262-286.
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2021). An examination of teachers’ strategies to foster student engagement in blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1-25.
Hidayat, A. T., Sudarman, S., Alfurqan, A., & Doni, S. (2021). Understanding level of UIN Imam Bonjol Padang’s lecturers towards the privacy policy application used in academic activities during the COVID-19 pandemic period. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1779(1).
Holte, A. (2024). A Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Understand the Dynamics of Smartphone Attachment and Problematic Smartphone use. Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science.
Langlais, P. J., & Bent, B. J. (2018). Effects of training and environment on graduate students’ self-rated knowledge and judgments of responsible research behavior. Ethics & Behavior, 28(1), 64-80.
Lukman, H., Setiani, A., & Muhassanah, N. (2020). Structural Equation Modelling of Teaching Quality on Students' Satisfaction. Journal of Physics: Conference Series.
Nordhoff, S., Malmsten, V., Arem, B., Liu, P., & Happee, R. (2021). A structural equation modeling approach for the acceptance of driverless automated shuttles based on constructs from the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology and the Diffusion of Innovation Theory. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 58-73.
O'Brien, B. (2015). An exploration of student perspectives of quality teaching at multi-level education environments. Dissertation.
Prasetyo, M. A., Ilham, M., & Asvio, N. (2022). Lecturer professionalism in improving the effectiveness of higher education institutions. International Journal of Educational Review, 4(1), 140-153.
Rahman, R. (2023). Komunikasi antar pribadi dosen dan mahasiswa dalam memotivasi belajar mahasiswa ilmu komunikasi universitas hang tuah pekanbaru. Jurnal Sosio-Komunika, 2(1).
Stoian, C., Fărcașiu, M., Dragomir, G., & Gherheș, V. (2022). Transition from Online to Face-to-Face Education after COVID-19: The Benefits of Online Education from Students’ Perspective. Sustainability, 14(19).
Verma, S., & Sengupta, S. (2024). New way to shaping India's academic environment: An assessment of the mechanism of integration of education 4.0 to industry‐centric learning. Computer Applications in Engineering Education.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ade Irfansyah, Suparji Suparji, Bambang Suprianto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.