Institutional Strengthening for the Enforcement of the Code of Ethics and Conduct for Constitutional Court Judges
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v3i12.12277Keywords:
Strengthening, Judicial Ethics and Conduct Enforcement Institution, Constitutional CourtAbstract
A decision of the MKMK that is’nt based on the Constitutional Court Regulation makes the dignity of the constitutional court begin to be questioned and doubted by the public. This research analyze and recommend an ideal design for the Constitutional Judges Code of Ethics and Conduct Enforcement Institution as an effort to strengthen the Constitutional Court's position. The research method uses normative juridical. The research approaches used are a statutory approach, a conceptual approach. The results is the future MKMK membership arrangement will not include active Constitutional Court judges. Members of the MKMK will be selected by an ad hoc panel of experts, with the goal of choosing professional MKMK members who will maintain the dignity of Constitutional Court judges.
References
Achmad Ali, (2009). Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) Dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence) Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence), Jakarta: Kencana
Achmad Musyahid Idrus, Hisbullah Hisbullah, Sofyan Sofyan, Mulham Jaki Asti, (2022). Constructive Ethics Of Judges In Indonesia; Problems And Strategic Strengthening, Untag Law Review, Volume 6, Issue 2, November 2022, PP 68 - 81
Ahmad Amin, (1983). Etika (Ilmu Akhlak), Jakarta: Bulan Bintang
Bambang Widjojanto, (2010). “Reformasi Konstitusi: Perspektif Kekuasaan Kehakiman,” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 58
Dylan Tandi , Rr. Ani Wijayati2, Nanin Koeswidi Astuti, (2024). Urgensi Lembaga Pengawas Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Melakukan Pengawasan Terhadap Hakim Konstitusi yang Melanggar Kode Etik dan Pedoman Perilaku Hakim. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains. VOLUME 7 ISSUE 3 MARET 2024.
Fajlurrahman Jurdi, Rizqa Ananda Hanapi, and Taufik Hidayat, (2020). “Optimalisasi Fungsi Pengawasan Dewan Etik Mahkamah Konstitusi,” Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan, No. 3:696
Imam Anshori Sholeh, (2014). Konsep Pengawasan Hakim, Jakarta: Setara Press.
Irfan Nur Rachman, (2020). Politik Hukum Yudisial Sumber Pembangunan Hukum Nasional, Depok: PT Raja Grafindo Persada
Jimly Asshiddiqie, 2014. Peradilan Etik Dan Etika Konstitusi, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Johny Ibrаhim, (2011). Teori dаn Metodologi Penelitiаn Hukum Normаtif, Mаlаng: Bаyumediа.
Lawrence M. Friedman, (1975).The Legal System Asocial Secience Perspective ,New York: Russel Sage Foundation, 13.
M. Fajrul Falaakh, 2009. Sistem Kekuasaan Kehakiman Di Indonesia, Jakarta: Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia
Munir Fuady, (2007). Sosiologi Hukum Kontemporer, Yogyakarta: PT Citra Aditya Bakti
Soerjono Soekanto dan Sri Mamudji, (1990). Penelitian Hukum Normatif suatu Tinjauan Singkat, Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Wahyu Aji Ramadan, irma Aulia Peritiwi, dkk. (2022). Reformulasi Pengawasan Mahkamah Konstitusi Demi Meningkatkan Efektivitas penegakan Kode Etik Hakim Konstitusi. Jurnal Studia Legalia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Volume 3 Nomor 2, November 2022
Wiryanto, (2016). “Penguatan Dewan Etik Dalam Menjaga Keluhuran Martabat Hakim Konstitusi,” Jurnal Konstitusi, no. 4 (2016): 729
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sinda Eria Ayuni, Ismawati Ismawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
