Paradigm of Post Positivism, Critical Theory, and Constructivism in Social Research

Authors

  • Shafa’ Annisa Puspasari Magister Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Intan Umull Magfira Sary Magister Manajemen, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Negeri Malang
  • Agung Winarno Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Negeri Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v3i12.12502

Keywords:

Post Positivism, Critical Theory, Constructivism, Social, Management

Abstract

This study aims to explore the application of post-positivism, critical theory, and constructivism paradigms in social research in the field of management. The method used in this study is a qualitative approach with descriptive and analytical data analysis, through the elaboration of main ideas related to the topic discussed. The results of the study indicate that the three paradigms, namely post-positivism, critical theory, and constructivism, all strive to advance science, although with different approaches. However, in essence, the three paradigms complement each other in providing a deeper and contextual understanding of managerial practices, as well as opening up opportunities for a more inclusive, fair, and socially dynamic managerial approach in the organization. The application of these three paradigms also encourages changes in the way of viewing roles and power in the organization, which can lead to improvements in overall managerial practices.

References

Anshari, E. S. (1991). Ilmu, Filsafat dan Agama. PT. Bina Ilmu, Surabaya.

Bahri, A. S. (2021). Pengantar Penelitian Pendidikan (Sebuah Tinjauan Teori dan Praktis). Bandung : Widina Bhakti Persada.

Dysmala, E. (2013). Kritik Terhadap Paradigma Positivisme. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 28(1), 622– 633.

Heru. (2009). Sastra Anak: dalam Kajian Strukturalisme, Sosilogi, Semiotika hinga Penulisan Kreatif. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Irwansyah, R. (2021). Perkembangan Peserta Didik. Bandung : Widina Bhakti Persada.

Nasser, A. A. (2021). Sistem Penerimaan Siswa Baru Berbasis Web Dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Siswa Di Era Pandemi. Biormatika: Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 100–109.

Salim, Agus. 2006. Teori dan Paradigma Penelitian Sosial; Buku Sumber Untuk Penelitian Kualittaif. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif,. Kualitatif dan R&D). Bandung : CV. Alfabeta.

Teori Pembelajaran Konstruktivisme Vygotsky: Mengajak Pikiran Berpetualang - PerpusTeknik.com di akses pada tanggal 23-11-2024 pukul 23.15

Tjahyadi. (2015). Refleksi Paradigma Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Humanika, 22(2), 47–57

UGM, T. D. F. I. (2001). FILSAFAT ILMU_Tim Dosen Fak Filsafat UGM. Liberty Yogyakarta. Wahyuni, S. (2017). Kritik (ideologi) terhadap cara berpikir Positivisme atau Scientisme, oleh Ricky Rengkung. In Perbanas Institute. https://dosen.perbanas.id/kritikideologi-terhadap-cara-berpikirpositivisme-atau-scientisme-olehricky-rengkung/

Wahyuni, S. (2017). Kritik (ideologi) terhadap cara berpikir Positivisme atau Scientisme, oleh Ricky Rengkung. In Perbanas Institute. https://dosen.perbanas.id/kritikideologi-terhadap-cara-berpikirpositivisme-atau-scientisme-olehricky-rengkung/

Downloads

Published

2024-12-13

How to Cite

Puspasari, S. A., Sary, I. U. M. ., & Winarno, A. . (2024). Paradigm of Post Positivism, Critical Theory, and Constructivism in Social Research. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(12), 5503 –. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v3i12.12502

Most read articles by the same author(s)