Evaluation of Lontar Prasi Bali Application based on Augmented Reality Using User Experience Questionnaire

Authors

  • I Gede Iwan Sudipa Bali Cultural Digitization Study Center, Institute of Business and Technology Indonesia (INSTIKI)
  • Putu Wirayudi Aditama Bali Cultural Digitization Study Center, Institute of Business and Technology Indonesia (INSTIKI)
  • Christina Purnama Yanti Bali Cultural Digitization Study Center, Institute of Business and Technology Indonesia (INSTIKI)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v1i9.1531

Keywords:

UX, User Experience Questionnare, Augmented Reality, Lontar Prasi Bali, Cultural Digitization

Abstract

The digitalization era supports the use of technology to preserve and strengthen local culture, such as using Augmented Reality (AR) to visualize Lontar Prasi figures and stories. To design and operate the Lontar Prasi Bali AR application optimally based on user demands, User Experience (UE) testing was conducted on 56 respondents with 8 questions on the application using User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ)  test shows that the average pragmatic and hedonic quality is 1.94, meaning the application is good at providing user pleasure and comfort. The Lontar Prasi Bali AR app provides above-average results (Excellent) and matches user expectations.

References

Aditama, P. W., & Setiawan, I. N. A. F. (2020). Indigenous Bali on Augmented Reality as a Creative Solution in Industrial Revolution 4.0. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1471(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1471/1/012008

Arifin, Y., Sastria, T. G., & Barlian, E. (2018). User experience metric for augmented reality application: a review. Procedia Computer Science, 135, 648–656. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.221

Benyon, D. (2019). Designing user experience. Pearson UK.

Derisma, M. H. H., & Hersyah, M. H. (2021). User Experience Measurement using Augmented Reality Application in Learning 4.0. ICED-QA 2019: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Development and Quality Assurance, ICED-QA 2019, 11 September 2019, Padang, Indonesia, 230.

Habib, K. N., Miller, E. J., Srikukenthrian, S., Lee-Gosselin, M., Morency, C., Roorda, M. J., & Shalaby, A. (2018). TTS2.0: A research and development (R&D) project on passenger travel survey methods. Transportation Research Procedia, 32, 659–665. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.004

Hartson, R., & Pyla, P. (2018). The UX book: Agile UX design for a quality user experience. Morgan Kaufmann.

Hinderks, A., Schrepp, M., Domínguez Mayo, F. J., Escalona, M. J., & Thomaschewski, J. (2019). Developing a UX KPI based on the user experience questionnaire. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 65, 38–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csi.2019.01.007

Hinderks, A., Schrepp, M., & Thomaschewski, J. (2018). A Benchmark for the Short Version of the User Experience Questionnaire. WEBIST, 373–377.

Hinzler, H. I. R. (1993). Balinese palm-leaf manuscripts. Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land-En Volkenkunde, 3de Afl, 438–473.

ISO 9241-210, 2019. (2019). International Standard interactive systems. Iso 9241-210:2019, 2019.

Laugwitz, B., Held, T., & Schrepp, M. (2008). Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. Symposium of the Austrian HCI and Usability Engineering Group, 63–76.

Mirnig, A. G., Meschtscherjakov, A., Wurhofer, D., Meneweger, T., & Tscheligi, M. (2015). A formal analysis of the ISO 9241-210 definition of user experience. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 437–450.

Sandhiyasa, I. M. S., Yanti, C. P., & Hendrawati, T. (2021). Implementation and Evaluation of Accounting Information Systems in Manufacturing Company Using System Usability Scale. Journal of Electrical, Electronics and Informatics, 5(2), 66–71.

Santoso, D. J., Angga, W. S., Silvano, F., Anjaya, H. E. S., Maulana, F. I., & Ramadhani, M. (2021). Traditional Mask Augmented Reality Application. 2021 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech), 1, 595–598. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTech53080.2021.9534954

Schrepp, M., Hinderks, A., & Thomaschewski, J. (2017). Design and evaluation of a short version of the user experience questionnaire (UEQ-S). International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 4 (6), 103-108.

Verhulst, I., Woods, A., Whittaker, L., Bennett, J., & Dalton, P. (2021). Do VR and AR versions of an immersive cultural experience engender different user experiences? Computers in Human Behavior, 125, 106951. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106951

Vital, R., & Sylaiou, S. (2022). Digital survey: How it can change the way we perceive and understand heritage sites. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage, 24, e00212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.daach.2022.e00212

Yan, H., Liu, W., Xia, X., Xu, Y., & Ssong, T. (2021). Design Research of Interactive Picture Books of Cultural Education Based on Augmented Reality Technology. 2021 16th International Conference on Computer Science & Education (ICCSE), 958–962. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSE51940.2021.9569391

Zeiner, K., Burmester, M., Haasler, K., Henschel, J., Laib, M., & Schippert, K. (2018). Designing for positive user experience in work contexts: Experience categories and their applications. Human Technology, 14(2), 140.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-31

How to Cite

I Gede Iwan Sudipa, Putu Wirayudi Aditama, & Christina Purnama Yanti. (2022). Evaluation of Lontar Prasi Bali Application based on Augmented Reality Using User Experience Questionnaire. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(9), 1845–1854. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v1i9.1531

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 9 (2022): October 2022

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 I Gede Iwan Sudipa, I Putu Wirayudi Aditama, Christina Purnama Yanti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.