The Impact of Financial Resources, Risk Acceptance, Customer Pressure on Financial Technology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i4.3914Keywords:
Financial Resourches, Risk Acceptance, Customer Pressure, Financial TechnologyAbstract
The study aims to identify the impact of financial resources, risk acceptance, and customer pressure on the adoption of financial technology on bank employees in Jakarta. The research uses a quantitative approach with survey methods and questionnaires as data collection tools. The sample consisted of 75 bank employees randomly selected from several banks in Jakarta. The data collected will be analyzed using the Structural Equation Model (SEM) to test the research hypothesis. The results of this research can provide an area on the factors that influence the adoption of Financial technology by banking employees, and provide recommendations for increasing the acceptance and use of this technology in the banking industry.
References
Chang, I.-C., Hwang, H.-G., Hung, M.-C., Lin, M.-H., & Yen, D. C. (2007). Factors affecting the adoption of electronic signature: Executives’ perspective of hospital information department. Decision Support Systems, 44(1), 350–359.
Djamaluddin, S., Hidayanto, A. N., & Wardhani, S. (2016). Perception of beneficiaries towards adoption of e-money in the distribution of social assistance in Indonesia. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 13–24.
Dowling, G. R., & Staelin, R. (1994). A model of perceived risk and intended risk-handling activity. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 119–134.
Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: a perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 451–474.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage.
Kim, S., & Garrison, G. (2010). Understanding users’ behaviors regarding supply chain technology: Determinants impacting the adoption and implementation of RFID technology in South Korea. International Journal of Information Management, 30(5), 388–398.
Langley, A., & Truax, J. (1994). A process study of new technology adoption in smaller manufacturing firms. Journal of Management Studies, 31(5), 619–652.
Lee, D. K. C., & Low, L. (2018). Inclusive fintech: blockchain, cryptocurrency and ICO. World Scientific.
Maduku, D. K., Mpinganjira, M., & Duh, H. (2016). Understanding mobile marketing adoption intention by South African SMEs: A multi-perspective framework. International Journal of Information Management, 36(5), 711–723.
Mawarni, I. S. (2017). Analisis persepsi masyarakat pengguna layanan transaksi digital pada financial technology [skripsi]. Bandung (ID): Universitas Telkom.
RUI, G. U. O. (2007). Information systems innovation adoption among organizations-A match-based framework and empirical studies.
Sila, I. (2013). Factors affecting the adoption of B2B e-commerce technologies. Electronic Commerce Research, 13, 199–236.
Sohail, M. S., & Shanmugham, B. (2003). E-banking and customer preferences in Malaysia: An empirical investigation. Information Sciences, 150(3–4), 207–217.
Toufaily, E., Daghfous, N., & Toffoli, R. (2009). The adoption of" E-banking" by Lebanese banks: Success and critical factors. International Journal of E-Services and Mobile Applications (IJESMA), 1(1), 67–93.
Zhao, Y., Yin, X., Qin, H., Zhu, F., Liu, H., Yang, W., Zhang, Q., Xiang, C., Hou, P., & Song, Z. (2008). Two supporting factors greatly improve the efficiency of human iPSC generation. Cell Stem Cell, 3(5), 475–479.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Elsye Fatmawati, Nataliana Bebasari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.







.png)




















