UC3 Model for Primary Grades Problem Solving
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i9.4458Keywords:
Attitude and Perception, Primary Math, Problem-Solving Skills, Polya’s UC3 ModelAbstract
This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of Polya’s UC3 model in improving the problem-solving skills and attitude and perception towards problem-solving of grade 2 students. Quantitative data were gathered through a two-group pre-posttest quasi-experimental design, and qualitative data were gathered through focused group discussion from 54 grade two students through convenient sampling. The Paired T-test and T-test for independent samples results revealed that UC3 model has increased students’ problem-solving skills to Satisfactory level with a significant pair difference and mean gain as compared to conventional method. It has also increased students’ attitude and perception with a significant mean gain in growth mindset and interest. Based on the findings, it is concluded that the utilization of the UC3 Model in teaching problem solving is effective in improving students’ skills and attitude and perception towards problem solving of grade 2 students. It further recommends for provision of programs and workshops by administrations, integration of UC3 in classroom instruction by the teachers, and further validation of findings by other researchers.
References
Abazov, R. (2022, January 14). How to Improve Your Problem-Solving Skills? Top Universities. https://www.topuniversities.com/blog/how-improve-your-problem-solving-skills
Albano, E., Jr. (2019, September 25). Grade 6 NAT scores at ‘low mastery’ level. The Manila Times. https://www.manilatimes.net/2019/09/26/campus-press/grade-6-nat-scores-at-low-mastery-level/621772/
Albay, E. M. (2019). Analyzing the effects of the problem solving approach to the performance and attitude of first year university students. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 1(1), 100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2019.100006
Alcantara, E. C., & Bacsa, J. M. P. (2017). Critical thinking and problem solving skills in mathematics of grade-7 public secondary students. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(4), 21-27. http://www.apjmr.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/APJMR-2017.5.4.2.03.pdf
Ali, R., Hukamdad, D., Akhter, A., & Khan, A. (2010). Effect of Using Problem Solving Method in Teaching Mathematics on the Achievement of Mathematics Students. Asian Social Science, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v6n2p67
Andrews‐Todd, J., Jackson, G. T., & Kurzum, C. (2019). Collaborative Problem Solving Assessment in an Online Mathematics Task. ETS Research Report Series, 2019(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12260
Angateeah, K. S. (2017). An Investigation of Students’ Difficulties in Solving Non-Routine Word Problem at Lower Secondary. International Journal of Learning and Teaching. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.3.1.46-50
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit Theories of Intelligence Predict Achievement Across an Adolescent Transition: A Longitudinal Study and an Intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
Britz, J.(2019) Problem Solving in Early Childhood Classrooms. ERIC Digest. Retrieved 15 December 2019, from https://www.ericdigests.org/1993/early.htm
Cai, J., & Lester, F. (2010). Why is teaching with problem solving important to student learning. National council of teachers of mathematics, 13(12), 1-6. https://www.washoeschools.net/cms/lib/NV01912265/Centricity/Domain/253/Math%20K-6/NCTM%20research%20brief.pdf
Carifio, J. (2015). Updating, modernizing, and testing Polya’s theory of [mathematical] problem solving in terms of current cognitive, affective, and information processing theories of learning, emotions, and complex performances. Journal of Education and Human Development, 4(3),105-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v4n3a12
Cheeseman, J. (2018). Teachers' Perceptions of Obstacles to Incorporating a Problem Solving Style of Mathematics into Their Teaching. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED592473
Chinnappan, M., & Chandler, P. (2010). Managing Cognitive Load in the Mathematics Classroom. The Australian Mathematics Teacher, 66(1), 5–11. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.961020792951417
Code, W., Merchant, S., Maciejewski, W., Thomas, M., & Lo, J. (2016). The Mathematics Attitudes and Perceptions Survey: an instrument to assess expert-like views and dispositions among undergraduate mathematics students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(6), 917–937. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2015.1133854
Daulay, K. R., & Ruhaimah, I. (2019). Polya theory to improve problem-solving skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188, 012070. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012070
Duncker, A. R. (2013). Exploring Student Perseverance in Problem Solving. LSU Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/671/
Gopinath, S., & Lertlit, S. (2017). The Implementation of Polya’s Model in Solving Problem-Questions in Mathematics by Grade 7 Students. Suranaree Journal of Social Science, 11(1), 47-59. https://so05.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/sjss/article/view/93631/73304
Gurat, M. G. (2018). Mathematical Problem-Solving Strategies among Student Teachers. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 11(3), 53-64. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1208772.pdf
Heick, T. (2017). What is the cognitive load theory? A definitionfor teachers. TeachThought. https://www.teachthought.com/learning/cognitive-load-theory/
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hoaglund, J. (2008). Enhancing Thinking Skills: Will Daily Problem Solving Activities Help? DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mathmidactionresearch/65/
Incebacak, B. B., & Ersoy, E. (2016). Problem Solving Skills of Secondary School Students. China-USA Business Review, 15(6). https://doi.org/10.17265/1537-1514/2016.06.002
Kadir, Z. A., Abdullah, N. H., Anthony, E., Salleh, B. M., & Kamarulzaman, R. (2016). Does Problem-Based Learning Improve Problem Solving Skills?—A Study among Business Undergraduates at Malaysian Premier Technical University. International Education Studies, 9(5), 166. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n5p166
Kalyuga, S. (2010). Schema Acquisition and Sources of Cognitive Load. Cognitive Load Theory, 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511844744.005
Kalyuga, S. (2011, March). Cognitive load theory: Implications for affective computing. In Twenty-Fourth International FLAIRS Conference. https://www.aaai.org/ocs/index.php/FLAIRS/FLAIRS11/paper/view/2505/3006
Kodan, H. (2017). Determination of Reading Levels of Primary School Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(11), 1962–1969. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.051112
Lasak, P. (2017). The effects of Polya’s problem solving process on mathematics problem solving skills and achievement of mathematics student teachers. In Proceedings of ISER 58th International Conference,(June) (pp. 27-30). http://www.worldresearchlibrary.org/up_proc/pdf/864-150046273727-30.pdf
Lee, C. I. (2016). An Appropriate Prompts System Based on the Polya Method for Mathematical Problem-Solving. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00649a
Lee, L. K. W. & Tan, A. G. (2000). Explicit teaching of problem-solving strategies in science. In L. S. Chia & H. K. Boo (Eds.), Chemistry teachers’ network: A source book for chemistry teachers (pp. 45-51). Singapore: Singapore National Institute of Chemistry. https://repository.nie.edu.sg/bitstream/10497/16652/4/BC-ETO-2000-45.pdf
Mahmood, T. F. P. T., & Mohd, N. (2011). The Effects of Attitude Towards Problem Solvingin Mathematics Achievements. http://www.ajbasweb.com/old/ajbas/2011/December-2011/1857-1862.pdf
Martinez, L. (2013). Perseverance in Solving Problems. HEART in Mind. https://loreamartinez.com/2013/11/27/perseverance-in-solving-problems/
Montague, M., & Applegate, B. (2000). Middle School Students’ Perceptions, Persistence, and Performance in Mathematical Problem Solving. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23(3), 215–227. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511165
Nasution, M. L., Yerizon, Y., & Gusmiyanti, R. (2018). Students’ Mathematical Problem- Solving Abilities Through The Application of Learning Models Problem Based Learning. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 335, 012117. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/335/1/012117
Novriani, M. R., & Surya, E. (2017). Analysis of Student Difficulties in Mathematics Problem Solving Ability at MTs SWASTA IRA Medan. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 33(3), 63-75. https://gssrr.org/index.php/JournalOfBasicAndApplied/article/view/7437/3479
NYSUT. (2015). Educator ’ s Voice. NYSUT’s Journal of Best Practices in Education, VIII, 1–118 https://doi.org/10.7176/jep/11-36-02
OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en.
Okafor, T. U. (2019). Effect of polya’s problem solving technique on the academic achievement of senior secondary school student in physics. European Journal of Physics Education, 10(1),38-48. http://31.220.4.173/index.php/EJPE/article/view/233
Olaniyan, A. O., Omosewo, E. O., & Nwankwo, L. I. (2015). Effect of Polya Problem- Solving Model on Senior Secondary School Students' Performance in Current Electricity. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(1), 97-104. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1107833.pdf
Palm, T. (2008). Impact of Authenticity on Sense Making in Word Problem Solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(1), 37–58. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40284639
Peteros, E., et. al. (2019). Attitude andAcademic Achievement of High School Students in Mathematics Under the Conditional Cash Transfer program. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 583-597. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5770
Phuntsho, U., & Dema, Y. (2019). Examining the Effects of Using Polya’s Problem- solving Model on Mathematical Academic Achievement and Analyzing Ability of the Fourth Grade Students. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2019/v5i230142
Powell, S. R. (2011). Solving Word Problems Using Schemas: A Review of the Literature. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26(2), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2011.00329.x
Priester, T. C. (Ed.). (2015). Foundations of Academic Success: Words of Wisdom. Open SUNY Textbooks, Milne Library, State University of New York at Geneseo. http://oer.iainpadangsidimpuan.ac.id/files/original/f9af1d3d392c468418aab7e5543f415a.pdf
Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (No. 246). Princeton university press. https://math.hawaii.edu/home/pdf/putnam/PolyaHowToSolveIt.pdf
Polya, G. (1981). Mathematical Discovery on Understanding, Learning and Teaching Problem Solving, Volumes I and II. John Wiley & Sons. https://www.isinj.com/mt-usamo/Mathematical%20Discovery%20Polya%20(1981,%20Wiley).pdf
Quigley, A., Muijs, D., & Stringer, E. (2018). Metacognition and self-regulated learning: guidance report.https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/31617/1/EEF_Metacognition_and_selfregulated_learning.pdf
Riccomini, P. J., Hwang, J., & Morano, S. (2016). (2016), "Developing Mathematical Problem Solving through Strategic Instruction: Much More Than a Keyword", Instructional Practices with and without Empirical Validity (Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities, Vol. 29), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 39-60. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0735-004X20160000029003
Ristevska, M., Kochoska, J., Gramatkovski, B., & Sivakova, D. (2015). The role of workbooks in the learning process in primary schools in the Republic of Macedonia. International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, 11(3), 691- 698. http://eprints.uklo.edu.mk/1042/
Russo, J., & Minas, M. (2020). Student Attitudes Towards Learning Mathematics Through Challenging, Problem Solving Tasks:“It’s so Hardin a Good Way”. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 215-225. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/1252
Schleicher, A. (2018). Insights and interpretations. Pisa 2018, 10.http://www.educationduepuntozero.it/wpcontent/uploads/2020/01/tabelleOCSEFierli.pdf
Scusa, T. (2008). Five Processes of Mathematical Thinking. Digital Commons @ Universityof Nebraska-Lincoln. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mathmidsummative/38/
Sharma, R., Jain, A., Gupta, N., Garg, S., Batta, M., & Dhir, S. (2016). Impact of self- assessment by students on their learning. International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research, 6(3), 226. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-516x.186961
Siemon, D., Day, L., Stephens, M., Horne, M., Callingham, R., Watson, J., & Seah, R. (2017). Reframing Mathematical Futures: Using Learning Progressions to Support Mathematical Thinking in the Middle Years. Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED589430.pdf
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). The Goal-Free Effect. Cognitive Load Theory, 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4_7
Sweller, J. (2018, November 30). Cognitive Load Theory (John Sweller).InstructionalDesign.Org. https://www.instructionaldesign.org/theories/cognitive-load/
Tambunan, H. (2019). The Effectiveness of the Problem Solving Strategy and the Scientific Approach to Students’ Mathematical Capabilities in High Order Thinking Skills. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5715
U.S. Department of Labor. (2017). Skills to Pay the Bills : Mastering Soft Skills for WorkplaceSuccess [E-book]. https://www.dol.gov/sites/dolgov/files/odep/topics/youth/softskills/softskills.pdf
Utami, A. R., Aminatun, D., & Fatriana, N. (2020). STUDENT WORKBOOK USE: DOES IT STILL MATTER TO THE EFFECTIVENESS OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING? Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.33365/jeltl.v1i1.247
Ulu, M. (2017). The Effect of Reading Comprehension and Problem Solving Strategies on Classifying Elementary 4th Grade Students with High and Low Problem Solving Success. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(6), 44. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i6.2391
Voltz, D. L., & Damiano-Lantz, M. (1993). Developing Ownership in Learning. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 25(4), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005999302500405
Wismath, S., Orr, D., & Zhong, M. (2014). Student perception of problem solving skills. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching and Learning Journal, 7(3). https://kpu.ca/sites/default/files/Transformative%20Dialogues/TD.7.3.5_Wismath_etal_Student_Perception.pdf
Wulandari, A. Y. R., Agustina, N., Hidayati, Y., & Tsulutsya, F. B. (2019). Increasing students’ problem-solving ability on the pressure concept through model-eliciting activities (MEAs). INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENCE AND APPLIED SCIENCE (ICSAS) 2019. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5141671
Wong, A. M. (2008). Developing Flexibility in Math Problem Solving. Harvard Graduate School of Education.https:/www.gse.harvard.edu/news/uk/08/12/developing-flexibility-math- problem-solving
Youssef-Shalala, A., Ayres, P., Schubert, C., & Sweller, J. (2014). Using a general problem-solving strategy to promote transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20(3), 215–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000021
Yusha’u, M. A., Muhammad, H. J., & Usman, I. G. (2020). Impact of Polya’s Problem- Solving Model On Students’ Mathematics Performance in Junior Secondary Schools in Zamfara State, Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications (IJSRP), 10(11), 180–184. https://doi.org/10.29322/ijsrp.10.11.2020.p10720
Zheng, R. Z., & Gupta, U. (2020). Cognitive Load in Solving Mathematics Problems: Validating the Role of Motivation and the Interaction Among Prior Knowledge, Worked Examples, and Task Difficulty. European Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 05. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/9252
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rachel Joy M. Carriaga-Baril
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
