Blended Learning: Basis for Institutional Development Model

Authors

  • Liezl May G. Perez Agusan Del Sur State College of Agriculture and Technology
  • Oliver C. Logroño Philippine Normal University - Mindanao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i11.5121

Keywords:

Blended Learning, New Normal, Development, Institutional Model

Abstract

This quantitative study was conducted to determine the implementation of blended learning in ASSCAT and develop an institutional model of flexible learning in the new normal. The data was collected from the selected fifty-eight (58) faculty members of Agusan del Sur State College of Agriculture and Technology through survey. The responses from the participants were thoroughly analysed. From the responses of the participants, it can be gleaned that most of the respondents uses smartphone and laptop. Meanwhile, most of the faculty respondents preferred the use of modules/hand-outs/factsheets followed by online references. Meanwhile, respondents generally perceived the extent of the preparation on the implementation for flexible learning modality delivery in the college as poor. Further, the respondents also perceived the preparation of flexible learning modality in teaching and learning in the institution as sometimes challenging. The results of this study also highlight the challenges encountered by faculty in the flexible learning delivery which were rooted in the following common reasons: unstable internet connection, lack of educational gadgets and materials and challenges in module production.

References

Allen, I. E., Seaman, J., & Garrett, R. (2007). Blending in: The extent and promise of blended learning education in the United States. Retrieved from http://www.sloan-c.org/publications/survey/pdf/Blending_In.pdf

Brooks, L. (2008). An analysis of factors that affect faculty attitudes toward a blended learning environment. (Ph.D dissertation, Faculty of the College of Education, TUI University, California).

DeLacey, B. J., & Leonard, D. A. (2002). Case study on technology and distance in education at the Harvard Business School. Educational Technology and Society, 5(2), 13-28.

Eddy, L. J., Nor-Aziah, A., & Jasmine, J. (2014). Blended Learning: Examining Concepts and Practices. In E. Mohamed-Amin (Ed.), Blended & Flipped Learning: Case Studies in Malaysian HEIs. Bangi: Pusat Pengajaran & Teknologi Pembelajaran, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002). Introduction to hybrid courses [electronic version]. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6), Retrieved from http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/garnham.htm

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

Garrison, R., & Vaughan, H. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles and guidelines. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Kim, K. J., Bonk, C. J., & Oh, E. (2008). The present and future state of blended learning in workplace learning setting in the United States. Performance Inprovement, 47(8), 5-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pfi.20018

Korr, J., Derwin, E. B., Greene, K., & Sokoloff, W. (2012). Transitioning an Adult-Serving University to a Blended Learning Model. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 60, 2-11.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2012.649123

Levin, S., Whitsett, D., & Wood, G. (2013). Teaching MSW social work practice in a blended online learning environment. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 33, 408-420.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2013.829168

Lionarakis, A., & Parademetriou, D. (2003). The quality of the learning experience: A comparative studybetween open distance and conventional education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 4(2).Retrieved from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde10/articles/lionarakis.htm

Singh, H., & Reed, C. (2001). A White Paper: Achieving success with blended learning, 6. Lexington, MA: Centra Software. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/2.1489 The Oxford Group. (2013). Blended Learning–Correct Use, Challenges and Best Practices, Report 2013. Kineo.

Wakefield, A. B., Carlisle, C., Hall, A., & Attree, M. J. (2009). Patient safety investigations: The need for interprofessional learning. Learning in Health and Social Care, 8(1), 22.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2008.00192.x

Young, J. R. (2002). ‘Hybrid’ teaching seeks to end the divide between traditional and online instructions.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-30

How to Cite

Perez, L. M. G., & Logroño, O. C. (2023). Blended Learning: Basis for Institutional Development Model. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(11), 4443–4458. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i11.5121