Balanced Human Resource Scorecard towards Quality, Efficiency and Timeliness of Secondary Teachers in Sarangani Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i9.5869Keywords:
Balanced Human Resource Scorecard, Secondary Teachers, Quality, Efficiency, TimelinessAbstract
The study focused to explore the balanced human resource scorecard towards quality, efficiency and timeliness of Secondary Teachers in Sarangani Province. There were one hundred fifty-seven (157) secondary teachers who served as respondents of the study. They are from the Alabel National High School and Malandag National High School respectively. The ANOVA shows that the teachers’ responses about the difference on the balanced human resource scorecard across Profile Age Group, Sex, Grade Level, Teaching Position and Teaching Experience are not significantly different. Results revealed that teachers have very high level of balanced human resource scorecard. Similarly, teachers have outstanding performance level using the balanced human resource scorecard. On the other hand, no correlation is found between balanced human resource scorecard and the performance level of teachers. Furthermore, no significant difference on the responses of the teachers with regards to balanced human resource scorecard and when grouped according to profile.
References
Becker, B. E., Huselid, M. A., & Ulrich, D. (2001). The HR scorecard: Linking people, strategy, and performance. Harvard Business Press.
Chavan, M. (2017). The balanced scorecard: A new challenge. Journal of Management Development, 28 (5), 44-66.
Cheon, S.H. and Reeve, J., (2015). A classroom-based intervention to help teachers decrease students’ amotivation. Contemporary educational psychology, 40, pp.99-111.
De Geuser, F., Mooraj, S., & Oyon, D. (2009). Does the balanced scorecard add value? Empirical evidence on its effect on performance. European Accounting Review, 18(1), 93-122.
Hoque, Z. (2014). 20 years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research. The British accounting review, 46(1), 33-59.
Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P., (2015). Balanced Scorecard Success: The Kaplan-Norton Collection (4 Books). Harvard Business Review Press.
Kerry, E. (2013). Teacher Performance Appraisal: More about Performance or Development? Australian Journal of Teacher Education Vol. 40, 9: 100-116.
Molleman, B. (2018). The challenge of implementing the Balanced Scorecard. International Journal of Business and Management, 8 (2), 145-165.
Prochnik, V. (2016). Seven Challenges for the Implementation of Balanced Scorecard in Hospitals. SSRN Electronic Journal, 12 (1), 22-44.
Punniyamoorthy, M., & Murali, R. (2008). Balanced score for the balanced scorecard: a benchmarking tool. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 15(4), 420-443.
Soklevski, T. (2014). Benefits of Using Balanced Scorecard in Strategic and Operational Planning. Universal Journal of Management, 2 (4), 165-171.
Solis, A. (2009). Pedagogical Content Knowledge – What Matters Most in the Professional Learning Content Teachers in Classrooms with Diverse Students Population.
Stewart, A. C., and J. Carpenter-Hubin. 2000–2001. The Balanced Scorecard: Beyond Reports and Rankings. Planning for Higher Education 29 (2): 37–42.
Sundin, H., Granlund, M., & Brown, D. A. (2010). Balancing multiple competing objectives with a balanced scorecard. European accounting review, 19(2), 203-246.
Yüksel, H., & Coşkun, A. (2013). Strategy focused schools: An implementation of the balanced scorecard in provision of educational services. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 2450-2459.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Cristita P. Garde
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
.png)
