Lived Experiences on Data Gathering of Development Studies Graduate and Post-Graduate Students in a Hybrid Learning Environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v3i7.9402Keywords:
Hybrid Learning, Data Gathering, Student Experiences, Development StudiesAbstract
The pandemic has led researchers to reconsider traditional approaches, resulting in an increased dependence on digital platforms for data gathering, analysis, and dissemination. This qualitative study investigates the experiences and adaptations of Development Studies graduate and post-graduate students at Ateneo de Davao University in data gathering within a hybrid learning environment. The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated a shift from traditional face-to-face data collection methods to hybrid approaches, combining in-person and online learning modalities. Drawing on connectivism theory, the study explores how students navigate digital networks and adapt research methodologies to hybrid settings. Through Key Informant Interviews (KIIs), data were collected from three graduate and post-graduate students, focusing on modifications in data gathering strategies, challenges encountered, and comparisons with traditional methods. Thematic analysis revealed themes related to methodological changes, technological integration, and shifts in research experiences. While hybrid learning offers enhanced accessibility and flexibility, challenges include ensuring data reliability and addressing technological barriers.
References
Alvarez, A. (2020). Learning from the problems and challenges in blended learning: Basis for faculty development and program enhancement. Asian Journal of Distance Education. https://www.asianjde.com/ojs/index.php/AsianJDE/article/view/433
Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member checking: A tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation?. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1802-1811.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cassidy, et al. (2016). "Blended learning and learner autonomy: A research review." Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 13(2), 5.
Cater, J. (2011). "Doing research in a networked world: Social research methods on the internet and beyond." Sage Publications.
CHED (2020). Guidelines on the Implementation of Flexible Learning. Commission on Higher Education.
Collaizi, P. (1978). Psychological Research as the Phenomenologist Views It. In R. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology (pp. 48-71). Oxford University Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Sage Publications.
Cuadra & Bernal (2023). The Lived Experiences of Graduate Students During In-Person and Remote Learning Platforms: Basis for Blended Learning Framework
Downes, S. (2007). An Introduction to Connective Knowledge. Huffington Post. http://www.downes.ca/cgi-bin/page.cgi?post=33034
Eaton, S. E. (2020). Academic Integrity in Online Learning: Critical Perspectives on Policies and Practices. IGI Global.
Eliveria, N. A. V., Fontes, H. M. G., & Lima, R. M. O. (2019). "Blended learning experiences in teacher education: A systematic review." International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1). [DOI: 10.1186/s41239-019-0182-8]
European Commission (2020). Digital Education Action Plan (2021-2027). European Commission.
Farrow, R. (2020). Open Education and Learning Design: Open Educational Resources, Teacher Education and International Development. Routledge.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Harasim, L. (2017). Learning Theory and Online Technologies. Routledge.
Harding, R., Jones, J., & Sullivan, W. (2012). "Blended learning in higher education: fostering interactive learning and online engagement." Computers & Education, 59(2), 352-364.
Hrastinski, S. (2019). "Blended and online learning." https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1334305.pdf
IAU (2020). The Global State of Hybrid Learning: A Report by the International Association of Universities.
Jankowski, N. W., & Selm, J. V. (2005). "Interviewing in the internet age: A comparison of face-to-face and telephone interviewing." Quality & Quantity, 39(3), 407-426.
Johnson, A. N. (2005). "Social identity online." European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(3), 275-283.
Koohang, A., & Durante, M. G. (2003). "The effectiveness of blended learning on student learning in a science methods course." Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(1), 11-24.
Laws, S., et al. (2013). Research for Development: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications.
Lobe, et al. (2020). Qualitative Data Collection in an Era of Social Distancing. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 160940692093787. doi:10.1177/1609406920937875
Ma'arop, S., & Embi, M. Z. (2016). "Blended learning: A review of its effectiveness in teacher education." Journal of Educational and Social Research, 6(2), 127-138.
Mataron, H., & Embi, M. A. (2016). Blended-Based Approach in Education. Educational Innovations Journal.
Matheos, K., & Cleveland-Innes, N. (2018). "Blended learning in teacher education: Possibilities and challenges." Journal of Education and Training, 37(2), 189-201.
Means, B., Bakia, M., & Murphy, R. (2013). Learning Online: What Research Tells Us About Whether, When and How. Routledge.
Morse, J. M. (2015). Critical Analysis of Strategies for Determining Rigor in Qualitative Inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1212-1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315588501
O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85-95.
Olelewe, N. S., & Agomuo, P. E. (2016). "Blended learning in teacher education: A critical review of the literature." Journal of Educational and Social Research, 6(3), 265-277.
Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5 Pt 2), 1189.
Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: The Key to Active Online Learning. Routledge.
Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
Van Nes, F., Abma, T., Jonsson, H., & Deeg, D. (2010). Language differences in qualitative research: Is meaning lost in translation?. European Journal of Ageing, 7(4), 313-316.
Van Nuil, E., Halvorsen, K., Boe, E., & Garde, J. G. (2023). "Research data collection methods during the COVID-19 pandemic: A review of methodological adaptations and solutions." International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 26(2), 235-252.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dana Gabrielle B. Tautho, Quennie Marie S. Zuyco, Cary M. Aragat, Erna P. Sumalinab, Marleonie M. Bauyot
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
