Validity of the Scientific Creativity Project Based Learning (SiPjBL) Model in physics learning to increase the scientific creativity of physics education undergraduate students in basic physics courses 1

Maimon  Sumo; Budi  Jatmiko; Zainul Arifin Imam  Supardi

doi:10.55927/jeda.v3i4.11266

Authors

Maimon Sumo Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
Budi Jatmiko Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia
Zainul Arifin Imam Supardi Universitas Negeri Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/jeda.v3i4.11266

Keywords:

Validity, Sipjbl Model, Scientific Creativity

Abstract

This research aims to describe the validity of the SiPjBL model reviewed from the aspects of model development needs and knowledge updates. The method used is development. The data collection technique is carried out by model validation and the research instrument is a model validation sheet containing statements referring to aspects of development needs and knowledge updates. Data analysis is carried out quantitatively by calculating the score on each component of each aspect of the model. The results of the study obtained an average score of 3.92 with a very valid category and the percentage of feasibility of the SiPjBL model reached 97%. Thus, the SiPjBL model is feasible to be implemented in the learning process in higher education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Andayani, S. (2020). The profile of critical thinking and learning outcomes of teacher candidates viewed from gender differences. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1567, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/4/042072

Andres, E. C. A., & Rosalinda, B. (2023). Online Flipped Learning Model in a College Physical Education Course. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(1), 413–425.

Arend, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach. In Mc Graw Hill (NINTH EDIT, Vol. 11, Issue 1).

Ayas, M. B., & Sak, U. (2018). Objective Measure of Scientific Creativity : Psychometric Validity of the Creative Scientific Ability Test Objective measure of scientific creativity : Psychometric validity of the Creative Scientific Ability Test. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13(October), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.06.001

Borg, W.R & Gall, M. . (1983). Eucation research: an introduction. (4th Editio). Longman Inc.

Cirkony, C. (2023). Flexible, creative, constructive, and collaborative: the makings of an authentic science inquiry task. International Journal of Science Education, 45(17), 1440–1462. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2213384

Cohen, L. N. M., & Ambrose, D. (1999). Adaptation and creativity. Runco, M.A. and Pritzker, S.R. (Ed.). Academic Press.

Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school. 24, 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912

Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2010). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098912

Maharani Putri Kumalasani, & Kusumaningtyas, D. I. (2022). 21 St Century Skill In Learning Models With A Steam Approach. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dasar, 05(April), 74–81.

Moreno, F. E. (2021). Learning electrical circuits for the development of critical thinking. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 2073, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2073/1/012001

Moreno, R. (2010). Educational psichology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Mukhopadhyay, R. (2013). Scientific Creativity- A New Emerging Field of Research : Some Considerations. 2(1), 1–9.

PISA. (2023). PISA 2022 Results Factsheets Indonesia. The Language of Science Education, 1, 1–9. https://oecdch.art/a40de1dbaf/C108.

Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. M. (2010). An introduction to educational design research.

Prahani, B. K., Suprapto, N., Rachmadiarti, F., Sholahuddin, A., Mahtari, S., Suyidno, & Siswanto, J. (2021). Online Scientific Creativity Learning (OSCL) in Science Education to Improve Students’ Scientific Creativity in Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(Special Issue), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.73

Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang Kemendikbud. (2019). Pendidikan di Indonesia Belajar dari Hasil PISA 2018. Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang Kemendikbud, 021, 1–206.

Rahayu, R., Iskandar, S., & Abidin, Y. (2022). Inovasi Pembelajaran Abad 21 dan Penerapannya di Indonesia. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 2099–2104. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i2.2082

Raj, H., & Saxena, D. R. (2016). Scientific creativity: A review of researches. European Academic Research, 4, 112–1138.

Sidek, R., Halim, L., Buang, N. A., & Mohamad Arsad, N. (2020). Fostering Scientific Creativity in Teaching and Learning Science in Schools: A Systematic Review. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 6(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v6i1.7149

Slavin, R. E. (2015). Instruction Based on Cooperative Learning. Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction, 388–404. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203839089.ch17

Solso, R. L., H. Maclin, O., & Maclin, M. K. (2007). Psikologi kognitif, edisi delapan. Erlangga.

Sumo, M., Jatmiko, B., Supardi, Z. A. I., & Suprianto, S. (2024). The Influence Of The Project-Based Learning Model On The Scientific Creativity Of Physics Education Undergraduate Students At Madura Islamic University. SEJ (Science Education Journal), 8(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.21070/sej.v8i2.1651

Suradika., Dwi., N. (2023). Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. 12(1), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.39713

Suyidno, Nur, M., Yuanita, L., & Prahani, binar kurnia. (2018). Issn 1648-3898 Issn 2538-7138 Effectiveness of Creative Responsibility Based Teaching ( Crbt ) Model on Basic Physics Learning To Increase Student ’ S Scientific Creativity and. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 136–151.

Test, P., Sak, U., & Ayas, M. B. (2014). Creative Scientific Ability Test ( C-SAT ): A new measure of scientific creativity Creative Scientific Ability Test ( C-SAT ): A new measure of scientific creativity. September 2013.

Wahyuni, L., & Rahayu, Y. S. (2021). Pengembangan E-Book Berbasis Project Based Learning (PjBL) untuk Melatihkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif pada Materi Pertumbuhan dan Perkembangan Tumbuhan Kelas XII SMA. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi (BioEdu), 10(2), 314–325. https://doi.org/10.26740/bioedu.v10n2.p314-325

Wibowo, F. C. (2023). Journal of Technology and Science Education. 13(1), 178–192.

Wicaksono, I. (2020). Validity and Practicality of the Biotechnology Series Learning Model to Concept Mastery and Scientific Creativity. 13(3), 157–170.