Influence Explicit Instruction Learning Model Strategy Against Results Study Participant Educate on Subjects Accountancy Class XI PIS SMA Negeri 4 Pematangsiantar Year Teachings 2023/2024
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/jeda.v3i2.9272Keywords:
Explicit Instruction , Results StudyAbstract
This research aims to prove the influence of strategy Explicit instruction learning model on student learning outcomes in the accounting subject class XI PIS SMA Negeri 4 Pematangsiantar. This type of research is quantitative research . The population in this study was all students in class XI PIS SMA Negeri 4 Pematangsiantar with a total of 104 students. The sample in this study consisted of 2 classes, namely class XI PIS-1 and class PIS-3 with a total of 68 students. Study done on March 26 – April 22 2024. Based on the results of descriptive analysis, it shows that the average accounting learning outcome in working paper material in classes that do not use the explicit instruction learning model strategy is 75.30. Meanwhile, the average learning outcome of students in classes that use the explicit instruction learning model strategy is 80. The results of inferential statistics using Ms.Excel 2010 obtained Sig (2 Tailed) < ɑ or (0.037 < 0.05) and the calculated t value was obtained > t table (2.131 > 1.996). So, based on the testing criteria, it can be said that Ha is accepted, namely that there is a significant influence of the explicit instruction learning model strategy on student learning outcomes in accounting subjects, working paper material for class XI PIS SMA Negeri 4 Pematangsiantar for the 2023/2024 academic year
Downloads
References
Arend dan Trianto 2010, Model Pembelajaran Explicit instruction
Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2014. Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineke Cipta
Feriawati, P., & Kusuma, A. P. (2020). View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk. Pengaruh Penggunaan Pasta Labu Kuning (Cucurbita Moschata) Untuk Substitusi Tepung Terigu Dengan Penambahan Tepung Angkak Dalam Pembuatan Mie Kering, 15(1), 274–282.
Ii, B. A. B., Teori, A. D., & Akuntansi, P. (n.d.). Bab%202-08403241031. 15–41.
Model, P., Instruction, E., Hasil, T., Pada, B., Pelajaran, M., Di, A., & Negeri, S. M. A. (2015). Nissa Tryana Lestari, 2015 PENGARUH MODEL EXPLICIT INSTRUCTION TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PADA MATA PELAJARAN AKUNTANSI DI SMA NEGERI JATINANGOR Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | .upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu. 1–10.
Nasution, M. (2018). Konsep Pembelajaran Matematika Dalam Mencapai Hasil Belajar Menurut Teori Gagne. Logaritma: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Sains, 6(02), 112. https://doi.org/10.24952/logaritma.v6i02.1280
Nurhayati. (2014). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Metode Bimbingan Mata Pelajaran IPA di Kelas III SD Inpres 1 Bainaa. Jurnal Kreatif Tadulako Online, 4(10), 1–11.
Pangabean, S., Lisnasari, S. F., Puspitasari, I., Basuki, L., Fuadi, A., & Firmansyah, H. (2021). Sistem Student Center Learning Dan Teacher Center Learning. In Media Sains Indonesia. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/jpis/article/view/3669
Raudhah, J., Wandini, R. R., & Sinaga, M. R. (2018). Games Pak Pos Membawa Surat Pada Sintax Model Pembelajaran Tematik. 06(01), 2338–2163. http://jurnaltarbiyah.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/raudhah
Slameto. (2019). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya, (Jakarta : Rineka Cipta,2000),hlm 2. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 5–48.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta, CV.
Sugiyono. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta, CV.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hanna Lestari Nainggolan, Anggun Tiur Ida Sinaga, Sotarduga Sihombing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
