Analysis of Science Literacy Skills of Students in X Class at High Schools in Yogyakarta City on the Competency Aspect in Biology Learning

Authors

  • Riska Herlena S Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Suyitno Aloysius Department of Biology Education, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v3i11.12384

Keywords:

Analysis Students Science Literacy Abilities, Competency Aspects, High School Biology Learning

Abstract

This research aims to determine the level of science literacy skills of students in X class at high schools in Yogyakarta City in the subject of biology based on PISA science literacy indicators. This research is a quantitative descriptive study using the survey method. The data collection technique used tests in the form of questions based on science literacy indicators in the competency aspect. The data analysis technique is inferential statistics with non-parametric statistics using the Kruskal-Wallis test to determine whether there are significant differences in each school. The research results show that the science literacy skills of public high school students in Yogyakarta City are in the low category with an average score of 57,88%. Further tests indicate significant differences among each school.

References

Abidin, Y., Mulyati, T., & Yunansah, H. (2018). Pembelajaran Literasi: Startegi Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika, Sains, Membaca, dan Menulis ( yanita N. I. Sari (ed.)). Bumi Aksara.

Ahsani, eva L. fakhru, Sarwi, Pertiwi, ratih P., Dewi, K., & Yuliyanti, N. (2024). Literasi Sains Inklusif Berbasis Kearifan Lokal (B. Wijayama (ed.); Cetakan Pe). Penerbit Cahya Ghani Recovery.

Aprizanti, Y. (2023). Penerapan Model Inkuiri Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa dalam Pembelajaran IPA Biologi. Jurnal Didaktika Pendidikan Dasar, 7(2), 411–436. https://doi.org/10.26811/didaktika.v7i2.618

Basam, F. (2021). Pembelajaran Literasi Sains: Tinjauan Teoretis dan Praktik. CV. Bintang Semesta Media.

Bellová, R., Melicherčíková, D., & Tomčík, P. (2018). Possible reasons for low scientific literacy of Slovak students in some natural science subjects. Research in Science and Technological Education, 36(2), 226–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1367656

Bórquez-Sánchez, E. (2024). Scientific literacy in biology and attitudes towards science in the Chilean education system. Research in Science and Technological Education, 00(00), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2024.2320104

Cordon, J. M., & Polong, J. D. B. (2020). Behind the Science literacy of Filipino students at PISA 2018: A Case study in the Philippines’ Educational System. Integrated Science Education Journal, 1(2), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v1i2.59

Djaali, & Muljono, P. (2008). Pengukuran dalam bidang pendidikan. Grasindo.

Education, T. O. M. of. (2006). A Guide to Effective Literacy Instruction, Grades 4 to 6: Volume One Foundations of Literacy Instruction for the Junior Learner. Ministry of Education.

Fadilah, F., Isti, S., Amarta, T. W. D., & Prabowo, C. A. (2020). An KEMAMPUAN LITERASI SAINS SISWA SMA PADA PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI MENGGUNAKAN NOSLiT. Jurnal BIOEDUIN : Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi, 10(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.15575/bioeduin.v10i1.8141

Fitriani, Harahap, F., & Manurung, B. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Biologi Siswa SMA Se-Kabupaten Aceh Tamiang, Aceh, Indonesia. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi Dan Pembelajarannya Universitas Negeri Medan.

Hikmah, M., Anwar, Y., & Riyanto. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Team Games Tournament (TGT) Terhadap Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik pada Materi Dunia Hewan Kelas X di SMA Unggul Negeri 8 Palembang. Jurnal Pembelajaran Biologi, 5(1), 56–73.

Hofverberg, A., Eklöf, H., & Lindfors, M. (2022). Who Makes an Effort? A Person-Centered Examination of Motivation and Beliefs as Predictors of Students’ Effort and Performance on the PISA 2015 Science Assessment. Frontiers in Education, 6(January), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.791599

Howard, P., O’Brien, C., Kay, B., & O’Rourke, K. (2019). Leading educational change in the 21st century: Creating living schools through shared vision and transformative governance. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154109

Husna, H., Nerita, S., & Safitri, E. (2023). Analysis of Student Difficulties in Learning Biology. Journal Of Biology Education Research (JBER), 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.55215/jber.v4i1.5963

Irhasyuarna, Y., & Putri, R. F. (2022). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Literasi Sains Pada Materi Kemagnetan. Pahlawan Jurnal Pendidikan-Sosial …. http://ojs.uvayabjm.ac.id/index.php/pahlawan/article/download/289/527

Jamco & Balami. (2022). Juan Charles Samuel Jamco 1 , Abdul Malik Balami 2* 1,2. Jurnal Matematika, Statistika Dan Terapannya, 1(1), 39–44. https://ojs3.unpatti.ac.id/index.php/parameter%0AANALISIS

Latifah, U., Amalia, L., & Putri, D. I. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa pada Penerapan Beberapa Model Pembelajaran. Jurnal Life Science: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 4(2), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.31980/jls.v4i2.2348

Mahanal, S., Zubaidah, S., Mukti, W. R., Agustin, M., & Setiawan, D. (2021). Promoting male and female students’ scientific literacy skills through RICOSRE learning model. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2330(February 2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0043309

Muhdhar, M. H. I. Al, Afifah, S. N., Handayani, N., Abdillah, R. R., Pammai, K., Mardiyanti, L., & Rahmawati, N. D. (2024). Analysis of scientific literacy of 11thgrade students at SMA Nasional Malang. AIP Conference Proceedings, 3106(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0215779

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results Factsheets Indonesia. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development) Publication, 1–9.

Palines, K. M. E., & Cruz, R. A. O. Dela. (2021). Facilitating factors of scientific literacy skills development among junior high school students. Lumat, 9(1), 546–569. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.9.1.1520

Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pembelajaran IPA abad 21 dengan literasi sains siswa. Jurnal Materi Dan Pembelajaran …, 9, 34–42.

Putri, S. P., Hariyadi, B., & Anggereini, E. (2023). Development of Essay Items Based on Critical Thinking in Biology Subject Material on Environmental Change at the High School Level in Sungai Bahar, Muaro Jambi Regency. BIODIK: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 9(2), 143–151.

Quraisy, A., & Hasni, N. (2021). Analisis Kruskal-Wallis Terhadap Kemampuan Numerik Siswa. VARIANSI: Journal of Statistics and Its Application on Teaching and Research, 3(3), 156–161. https://doi.org/10.35580/variansiunm29957

Rahmadani, F., Setiadi, D., Yamin, M., & Kusmiyati, K. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Biologi Peserta Didik SMA Kelas X di SMAN 1 Kuripan. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 7(4b), 2726–2731. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v7i4b.1059

Rahmadani, R., & Jefriyanto, J. (2021). A STRATEGY TO PROMOTE THE COMPETITIVENESS OF MICRO, SMALL AND MEDIUM ENTERPRISES (MSME) DURING THE CONDITION OF COVID 19 PANDEMICS. https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.11.3.197-208

Rohmah, I. L., & Hidayati, S. N. (2021). Analisis literasi sains peserta didik SMPN 1 Gresik. PENSA: E-Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 9(3), 363–369.

Suroso, J., Indrawati, Sutarto, & Mudakir, I. (2021). Profile of high school students science literacy in east java. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1832(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1832/1/012040

Yusmar, F., & Fadilah, R. E. (2023). Analisis Rendahnya Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Indonesia: Hasil Pisa Dan Faktor Penyebab. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 13(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v13i1.283

Downloads

Published

2024-11-29

How to Cite

S, R. H., & Aloysius, S. . (2024). Analysis of Science Literacy Skills of Students in X Class at High Schools in Yogyakarta City on the Competency Aspect in Biology Learning. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 3(11), 5393 –. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v3i11.12384