Evaluation of the Performance of the Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (Tesda) Training Institutions in Region VIII

Authors

  • Geryl Cataraja Palompon Institute of Technology, Palompon Leyte, Philippines
  • Roger Cataraja TESDA Calubian Leyte

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v1i6.695

Keywords:

TESDA, APACC, Performance Evaluation System

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (TESDA) Training Institutions in Region VIII covering the three provinces of Biliran, Leyte, and Eastern Samar. The findings revealed that the overall rating in all the areas of performance resulted to a Level 1 status which means that the three training institutions in Region VIII have met the threshold of APACC standards and their deficiencies could be improved within a period of two years. Based on the documentary inspection of the researcher, the performance level of the training and facilitative staff based on their Performance Evaluation System (PES) was very satisfactory. Furthermore, the results showed that the training and facilitative staff were performing their duties and functions in accordance with their job description.  On the relationship between variables it was revealed that the performance of the training and facilitative staff was not significantly related to the performance of the training institutions.Anchored on the findings presented, it was concluded that the performance of the three TESDA Training Institutions have met and qualified on the Level I status which corresponds to the Asia Pacific. Moreover, the performance of the training staff is not related to that of the facilitative staff. However, the performance of the training and facilitative staff is independent on the performance of the training institution.

References

Alan Price. Human Capital, 2007. (http://www.hrmguide.net/hrm/chap2/ )

Anderson, Andrea A.. The Community Builder’s Approach to Theory of Change a Practical Guide to Theory Development, http://learningforsustainability.net.

Bitter, Lester Robert and Ramsey, Jackson Eugene. Encyclopedia of Professional Management Vol. l Second Edition. Grolier International Danbury, Connecticut, 1995.

Brian Rowan et. al. On the Measuring Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge, 2001.

Carnevale & Schulz. Evaluation is an integral part of most instructional design (ID) models, 1990 (www.ifets.info/journals/5_2/eseryel.html )

Champy, James. Reengineering Management. Harper Collins Publishers, 1995.

Congressional Commission on Education (EDCOM) report of 1991, (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_in_the_Philippines.)

Dallas L. Holmes. Purposes of Evaluation,1999.(www.evaluationwiki.org/index)

Delaney John T. Organizational Performance,1996(www.jstor.org/stable/256718)

Lewis, James. School Management by Objectives. Parker Publishing Company, Inc. West New York, 1974.

Payos, Ranulfo, P. Human Resource Management. Rex Book Store, Inc. Philippines, 2010.

Scriven, M., Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 1991.

Sison, Pecfecto, S. Personnel Management in 21st Century. Rex Printing Company Inc., 2003.

W.K. Kellogg Foundation. Evaluation Handbook, 2006.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-27

How to Cite

Cataraja, G., & Cataraja, R. (2022). Evaluation of the Performance of the Technical Education and Skills Development Authority (Tesda) Training Institutions in Region VIII. East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(6), 947–960. https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v1i6.695

Issue

Section

Articles