Withdrawal of A Motor Fiduciary Guarantee Vehicle by Financing Companies against The Debtors Experienced Loss of Loans (Study of Decision Number : 50/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Plk)

Authors

  • Anggo Doyoharjo Slamet Riyadi University, Surakarta, Indonesia

Keywords:

motor vehicle withdrawal, financing, debtor, bad credit, fiduciary guarantee

Abstract

The results of the study indicate that the issue of motor vehicle withdrawals by finance companies is against debtors who experience bad credit with fiduciary guarantees. Decision Number: 50/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Plk. The defendant as of March 12, 2015 until this case has permanent legal force and until it is carried out, for example the calculation of arrears in installments is in arrears from March 20 to March 31, 2015 = 20 days, so Rp 7,970,000 x 0.2 % = 15,940 x 20 days totaling Rp 318,800,-, so that the Defendant's responsibility is to pay a late fine of 0.2% every day starting from March 12, 2015 until this case has permanent legal force and is implemented. Based on the evidence from the letters and statements of witnesses, it is evident by law that the Defendant is bound by a lease agreement with the Plaintiff and the Defendant has an obligation to pay the lease installments to the Plaintiff for 48 months from October 12, 2013 to September 12, 2017, but the Defendant only fulfilled the obligation to pay installments for 17 months, the last installment was in February 2015, from March 2015 until the maturity date of September 12, 2017 did not pay installments, so that the Defendant only partially fulfilled his achievements/obligations. The legal consequence is the Verstek Decision, because the Defendant was never present at the trial even though he had been legally and properly summoned. The Defendant paid the late fee based on the Lease Financing Agreement and the Plaintiff's lawsuit was registered at the Palangka Raya District Court until the decision was final and binding.

References

Cahyana, F. (2020). Urgensi Pengaturan Suap Di Sektor Swasta Sebagai Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Jurist-Diction, 3(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.20473/jd.v3i1.17623

Enel Reza Hafidzan, Ery Agus Priyono, D. H. (2015). Diponegoro law journal. Serambi Hukum, 6(02), 1–13. https://ejournal3.undip.ac.id/index.php/dlr/article/view/17434

Febriyanti, W. D. R. (2021). EKSEKUSI OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 18/PUU-XVII/2019. ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata, 6(2), 39. https://doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v6i2.128

Hadisantoso, A. B. (2018). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KREDITOR PEMEGANG HAK TANGGUNGAN TERHADAP OBYEK HAK TANGGUNGAN YANG DILETAKKAN SITA JAMINAN (ANALISIS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI JAKARTA TIMUR NOMOR 321/PDT.G/2012/PN.JAKTIM DAN NOMOR 211/PDT.G/2014/PN.JAK.TIM). Jurnal Sapientia et Virtus, 3(2), 10–27.

http://jurnal.ukdc.ac.id/index.php/SEV/article/download/180/140/

Hasudungan, A. N. (2021). IMPLEMENTASI KONSEP TRIPLE NEXUS DALAM UPAYA MEMBANGUN PERDAMAIAN (PEACEBUILDING) SETELAH KONFLIK AMBON-MALUKU. Harmoni, 20(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.32488/harmoni.v20i1.469

Indrawati, Y. (2009). UANG PAKSA: TlNJAUAN HUKUM KEUANGAN NEGARA. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 9, 90. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol0.no0.197

K Siwi, C. T. (2017). Aspek Hukum Benda Tidak Bergerak sebagai Obyek Jaminan Fidusia. NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan, 2(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.2.1.150.13-22

Kandou, H., Harjono, D., & Tehupeiroy, A. (2021). Jaminan Fidusia Sebagai Jaminan Kebendaan yang Memberi Hak Mendahulu Dalam Perolehan Pelunasan Utang. Tô-Râ, 7(Februari), 132–141. http://ejournal.uki.ac.id/index.php/tora/article/view/2625/1737

Khariati, N. D. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Bagi Penarikan Paksa Kendaraan Oleh Debt Collector. Perspektif Hukum, 20(2), 180–202. https://perspektif-hukum.hangtuah.ac.id/index.php/jurnal/article/view/84/69

Prabowo, R. B., & Salam, A. (2021). AKIBAT HUKUM PENGALIHAN OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA ATAS NAMA PASANGAN DALAM PERKAWINAN SEBAGAI PEMBERI FIDUSIA OLEH PASANGAN LAINNYA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI PEKANBARU NOMOR: 853/PID.SUS/2019/PN PBR). Indonesian Notary, 3(1), 1–23. http://notary.ui.ac.id/index.php/home/article/view/1429

Raco, J. R. (2010). METODE PENELlTlAN KUALlTATlF JENIS, KARAKTERISTIK, DAN KEUNGGULANNYA. PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Slamet, S. R. (2013). Tuntutan Ganti Rugi dalam Perbuatan Melawan Hukum: Suatu Perbandingan dengan Wanprestasi. Lex Jurnalica (Journal of Law), 10(2), 107–120. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/18068-ID-tuntutan-ganti-rugi-dalam-perbuatan-melawan-hukum-suatu-perbandingan-dengan-wanp.pdf

Usman, R. (2021). Makna Pengalihan Hak Kepemilikan Benda Objek Jaminan Fidusia Atas Dasar Kepercayaan. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia

Iustum, 28(1), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss1.art7

Zaman, M. R. (2020). EKSEKUSI SERTIFIKAT JAMINAN FIDUSIA PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 18/PUU-XVII/2019. MIYAH: Jurnal Studi Islam, 16(1), 228–244. http://ejournal.inkafa.ac.id/index.php/miyah/article/download/250/196

Downloads

Published

2022-04-18

How to Cite

Anggo Doyoharjo. (2022). Withdrawal of A Motor Fiduciary Guarantee Vehicle by Financing Companies against The Debtors Experienced Loss of Loans (Study of Decision Number : 50/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Plk). East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 1(2), 199–208. Retrieved from https://journal.formosapublisher.org/index.php/eajmr/article/view/88

Issue

Section

Articles