Position of Criminal Case Review Decision as Novum in Submission of Civil Case Review

Authors

  • Melisa Yunika S Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Banjarmasin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/marcopolo.v2i7.10400

Keywords:

Reviews, Criminal Matters, New Evidence (Novum), Perdata Matters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to 1) find out and analyze whether a decision to review a criminal case can be used as new evidence (novum) on a review of a civil case. 2) To know and analyse how the criteria novum according to the Civil Procedure Law. Research method with the type of research in this research is normative law research (normative legal research). The type of research is a legal vacuum. The nature of research is prescriptive. The analysis of this research is done by criticising, supporting, or commenting, and then making a conclusion on the results of the research with the help of a library study. A method for normative research is a prescriptive method, a method of analysis that gives a judgment (justification) of the object being studied whether it is true or wrong or what it is supposed to be according to the law. Results of research obtained first; a novum must meet the requirement that the novum has to be definite, that it exists before the matter begins to be examined, and that it is not found when the process of examination is in progress. Second; Novum in civil matters is explicitly referred to as a means of proof of letters. Thus, the notion of evidence (novum) is evidence in the form of a letter containing a fact already existing at the time of a quo investigation in the first instance before the quo is settled by the court.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A.K. Muhammad, 1986. Hukum acara perdata Indonesia, Bandung: Alumni

Adami Chazawi, Lembaga Peninjauan Kembali (PK) Perkara Pidana: Penegakan Hukum dalam penyimpangan praktik dan peradilan sesat, cetakan kedua, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta

Agung Barok, 2017, Analisis Yuridis Pengaturan Ideal Peninjauan Kembali Perkara Pidana Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 34/PUU-XI/2013, Jurnal Pasca Sarjana Hukum UNS, Vol. V, No.2

Hardianto Djanggih dan Yusuf Saefudin. 2017. “Pertimbangan Hakim Pada Putusan Praperadilan:Studi Putusan Nomor: 09/Pid.Pra/2016/Pn.Lwk Tentang Penghentian Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Politik Uang”, dalam Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 17, No 3

https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id. Tanggal Akses 19 Februari 2023

Lilik Mulyadi, 2002. Hukum Acara Perdata menurut Teori dan Praktik Peradilan Indonesia, Jakarta : Djambatan

M.Y. Harahap, 2008. Kekuasaan Mahkamah Agung; Pemeriksaan kasasi & peninjauan kembali perkara perdata, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Moeljatno, 1993. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Mukti Arto, 2018. Upaya Hukum Kasasi Dan Peninjuan Kembali. Depok: Prenadamedia Group

Mukti Fajar MD dan Yulianto Achmad, 2010. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Hukum Empiris, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2010. Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Media

Prosedur Penanganan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Putusan pengadilan Yang elah Memperoleh Kekuatan Hukum Tetap.

Soedirjo, 2014. Peninjauan Kembali dalam Perkara Pidana (Arti dan Makna), Cet. I, Jakarta: CV. Akademika Pressindo

Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2009. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty: Yogyakarta

Sutantiodan Winata, 1983. Hukum acara perdata dalam teori dan praktek, Bandung: Alumni

Yahya Harahap, 2000. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP; Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi dan Peninjauan Kembali, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika

Downloads

Published

2024-07-27

How to Cite

Yunika S, M. . (2024). Position of Criminal Case Review Decision as Novum in Submission of Civil Case Review. Indonesian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research in Science and Technology, 2(7), 1053–1064. https://doi.org/10.55927/marcopolo.v2i7.10400

Issue

Section

Articles