Position of Criminal Case Review Decision as Novum in Submission of Civil Case Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/marcopolo.v2i7.10400Keywords:
Reviews, Criminal Matters, New Evidence (Novum), Perdata MattersAbstract
The purpose of this study is to 1) find out and analyze whether a decision to review a criminal case can be used as new evidence (novum) on a review of a civil case. 2) To know and analyse how the criteria novum according to the Civil Procedure Law. Research method with the type of research in this research is normative law research (normative legal research). The type of research is a legal vacuum. The nature of research is prescriptive. The analysis of this research is done by criticising, supporting, or commenting, and then making a conclusion on the results of the research with the help of a library study. A method for normative research is a prescriptive method, a method of analysis that gives a judgment (justification) of the object being studied whether it is true or wrong or what it is supposed to be according to the law. Results of research obtained first; a novum must meet the requirement that the novum has to be definite, that it exists before the matter begins to be examined, and that it is not found when the process of examination is in progress. Second; Novum in civil matters is explicitly referred to as a means of proof of letters. Thus, the notion of evidence (novum) is evidence in the form of a letter containing a fact already existing at the time of a quo investigation in the first instance before the quo is settled by the court.
Downloads
References
A.K. Muhammad, 1986. Hukum acara perdata Indonesia, Bandung: Alumni
Adami Chazawi, Lembaga Peninjauan Kembali (PK) Perkara Pidana: Penegakan Hukum dalam penyimpangan praktik dan peradilan sesat, cetakan kedua, Sinar Grafika, Jakarta
Agung Barok, 2017, Analisis Yuridis Pengaturan Ideal Peninjauan Kembali Perkara Pidana Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 34/PUU-XI/2013, Jurnal Pasca Sarjana Hukum UNS, Vol. V, No.2
Hardianto Djanggih dan Yusuf Saefudin. 2017. “Pertimbangan Hakim Pada Putusan Praperadilan:Studi Putusan Nomor: 09/Pid.Pra/2016/Pn.Lwk Tentang Penghentian Penyidikan Tindak Pidana Politik Uang”, dalam Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 17, No 3
https://kepaniteraan.mahkamahagung.go.id. Tanggal Akses 19 Februari 2023
Lilik Mulyadi, 2002. Hukum Acara Perdata menurut Teori dan Praktik Peradilan Indonesia, Jakarta : Djambatan
M.Y. Harahap, 2008. Kekuasaan Mahkamah Agung; Pemeriksaan kasasi & peninjauan kembali perkara perdata, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Moeljatno, 1993. Asas-asas Hukum Pidana, Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Mukti Arto, 2018. Upaya Hukum Kasasi Dan Peninjuan Kembali. Depok: Prenadamedia Group
Mukti Fajar MD dan Yulianto Achmad, 2010. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Hukum Empiris, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, 2010. Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Media
Prosedur Penanganan Perkara Peninjauan Kembali Putusan pengadilan Yang elah Memperoleh Kekuatan Hukum Tetap.
Soedirjo, 2014. Peninjauan Kembali dalam Perkara Pidana (Arti dan Makna), Cet. I, Jakarta: CV. Akademika Pressindo
Sudikno Mertokusumo, 2009. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia, Liberty: Yogyakarta
Sutantiodan Winata, 1983. Hukum acara perdata dalam teori dan praktek, Bandung: Alumni
Yahya Harahap, 2000. Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP; Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi dan Peninjauan Kembali, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Melisa Yunika S

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








