The Effect of ESG Disclosure on Company Value with Profitability as a Moderation Variable
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/ijba.v6i3.16620Keywords:
ESG, Profitabilitas, Tobin's Q, Fixed Effect Model, Variabel ModerasiAbstract
This study aims to examine the influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosure on Company Value proxied using Tobin's Q, as well as to test the role of profitability as a moderation variable in companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) for the 2020–2024 period. The study used an explanatory quantitative approach with panel data consisting of 117 companies during the observation period, resulting in 574 observations (unbalanced panels). The model selection was carried out through the Chow Test, the Hausman Test, and the Lagrange Multiplier (LM) Test. The test results showed that the Chow Test (p=0.0000), the Hausman Test (p=0.0407), and the LM Test (p=0.0000) directed the best model to the Fixed Effect Model (FEM). The results of the estimate show that ESG has a coefficient of −0.044 (p=0.823) so that it does not have a significant effect on the Company's Value. The ESG×ROA moderation variable also showed a coefficient of −0.161 (p=0.856) so it was not proven to moderate the relationship between ESG and Company Value. However, the model is simultaneously significant with an F-statistic value of 8.239 and Prob(F-statistic)=0.0000, so the model is considered feasible to use. An Adjusted R² value of 0.599 indicates that the model is able to explain 59.9% of Tobin's Q variations. These results are in line with Patima et al. (2024) which found that environmental disclosure did not have a significant effect on the company's value in the basic materials sector on the IDX.
Downloads
References
Baltagi, B. H. (2021). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53953-5
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Brigham, E. F., & Houston, J. F. (2019). Fundamentals of Financial Institution Management. Cengage Learning.
Chairiyati, F., Isnaeni, N., Ary Dean Amri, & Fauziah Chairiyati. (2025). Environment, Social, and Governance (ESG) and firm value: Study on IDX ESG Leader Index emitters. The Asian Journal of Professional & Business Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.61688/ajpbs.v6i1.389
Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A Simple Approximation of Tobin’s q. Financial Management, 23(3), 70. https://doi.org/10.2307/3665623
Connelly, B. L., Certo, S. T., Ireland, R. D., & Reutzel, C. R. (2011). Signaling Theory: A Review and Assessment. Journal of Management, 37(1), 39–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310388419
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder Theory. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815768
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. J. (2017). Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.180
Hanafi, Mamduh M. ; Halim, A. (2016). Analisis Laporan Keuangan (5th ed.). UPP STIM YKPN.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis, Second Edition: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Publications. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=8ZM6DwAAQBAJ
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Lyon, T. P., & Maxwell, J. W. (2011). Greenwash: Corporate Environmental Disclosure under Threat of Audit. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 20(1), 3–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00282.x
Patima, M. Helmi, S., & Rusmita, S. (2024). Effect of Environmental Accounting on Firm Value with Profitability as an Intervening Variable. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, 08(09), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.51505/IJEBMR.2024.8914
Shen, H., Fu, M., Pan, H., Yu, Z., & Chen, Y. (2020). The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Firm Performance. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(10), 2213–2230. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2020.1785863
Spence, M. (1973). Job Market Signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882010
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (2nd ed.). Alfabeta.
Veronieka, P. V., & Rusmita, S. (2025). Green Accounting, Csr, And Independent Commissioners On Firm Value: Audit Quality AS A MODERATOR. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, Manajemen Dan Ekonomi Islam (JAM-EKIS), 8(3), 1435–1453.
Wardana, A., Sasongko, R. M., Adiyatna, H. R., Budi, R. S., & Fatmayuni, I. A. (2025). Do profitability and liquidity drive market valuations? A study based on Tobin Q in LQ45 Firms (Q1 2021 – Q3 2024). Priviet Social Sciences Journal, 5(9), 220–231. https://doi.org/10.55942/pssj.v5i9.587
Waruwu, J. S., & Hendrajaya, H. (2025). Pengaruh Kinerja Keuangan dan Kebijakan Dividen terhadap Nilai Perusahaan pada Perusahaan Sektor Pertambangan di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), 7(4), 1606–1614. https://doi.org/10.34007/jehss.v7i4.2622
Widyawati, L. (2020). A systematic literature review of socially responsible investment and environmental social governance metrics. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(2), 619–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2393
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yulius Paul Pian, Sari Rusmita, Umiaty Hamzani

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





































