Geogebra Application for Trigonometry Subject: A Quasi-Experimental Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/eajmr.v2i5.4152Keywords:
Geogebra Application, Trigonometry, Experimental, PhilippinesAbstract
This study aimed to investigate Geogebra representation as a strategy in improving students’ achievement in Trigonometry. This research employed an experimental design. The participants of this study were college students from Davao De Oro State College T-test was used to determine if there is a significant difference in the pre-test, post-test and gain scores in trigonometric functions of control and experimental groups. Results showed that there is a significant difference in the post-test and gain scores of the control and experimental groups. This means that students who were taught Trigonometric functions using Geogebra performed better than students who were taught using the traditional approach. This only shows that Geogebra is an effective strategy in teaching Trigonometry subject.
References
Abad, A. (2012). Using manipulatives to teach elementary mathematics. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies.
Adante, Z. (2012). Introducing dynamic mathematics software to secondary school teachers: The case of GeoGebra. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 28(2), 135-146. IBM Corp. Released 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. International GeoGebra Institute (IGI). (May 2016). GeoGebra (Version 5.0.232)
Akanso, A. L. (2013). A mixed method study measuring the perceptions of administrators, classroom teachers and professional staff on the use of iPads in the Midwest school district. (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest, UMI Dissertation Publishing.
Allen, M. (2013). Standards for Mathematical Practice. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Practice/
Alcantara, E. C., & Basca, J. P. (2017). Critical Thinking and Problem Solving Skills in Mathematics of Grade-7 Public Secondary Students. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. Lyceum of the Philippines University-Batangas, Philippines. 21-27
Azul, V. (2013). Development of ideas on a GeoGebra-aided mathematics instruction. Online Submission, 3(3), 1-7. Mathematics Vision Project. (2014a). Ready, Set, Go Answer key and Sample Assessments. Secondary Mathematics III: An Integrated Approach.
Bilgici, H. (2011). Contributions to probability and statistics; essays in honor of Harold Hotelling. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bulut, P. S. (2011). Evaluation of the effectiveness and implementation of a Math manipulative project. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting Mid-South Educational Research Association Nashville, TN. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.org
Cherry, K. (2019). Gardner’s Theory of Multiple Intelligences. Verywellmind.
Corlu, C. (2015). Does the use of hands-on learning, with manipulatives, improve the test scores of secondary education trigonometry standards?. (Master’s Thesis). Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.org.
Couture, K. (2012) Math manipulatives to increase 4th grade student achievement. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov.
Ehat, C. C. (2009). Curriculum coherence: An examination of US mathematical and science content standards from an international perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 525-559.
Henkay, M. (2013). The common core state standards for Mathematics. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2(1), 49-54.
Hohenwarter, M. (2009). Trigonometry Results From The Third International Mathematics And Science Study. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(6), (pp. 367-373): Reston,VA:NCTM.
Ispir, F. (2011). The Effect of Using The Geometer’s Sketchpad (GSP) on Jordanian Students’ Understanding Some Geometrical Concepts. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and learning, from http://www.cimt.plymouth.ac.uk/journal/almeqdadi.pdf
Jarvis, E. (2009). The Role of the Graphic Calculator in Mediating Graphing Activity, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science & Technology: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Kim, H., Parl, S., Joh, W. (2019). A study on Technology Development Performance and Technology Commercialization Performance according to the Techonology development Capability of SMEs Focusing on a Comparative Analysis of Technology Business Groups. Journal Open Innovation: Technology, Market and Complexity.
Kllogjeri, J. K. (2011). Using touch-screen technology, apps, and blogs to engage and sustain high school students’ in chemistry topics. Journal of Chemical Education, 91, 1818-1822.
Kutluca, R. G. (2012). Why schools matter: A cross-national comparison of curriculum and learning. The Jossey-Bass Education Series. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco, CA.
Lizada, K. (2011). The Nation’s Report Card: Grade 12 Reading and Mathematics 2009 National and Pilot State Results (NCES 2011-455). Washington, DC: Institute of Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Malia, D. (2013). The iPad: A Mathematics classroom tool for implementing the common core state standards technology vision. Tablets in K-12 Education: Integrated Experiences and Implications. IGI Global, 12, 128-135. doi: 10.4018/978-1-4666-6300-8.ch009.
Mammarella, I., Giofre, D., Caviola, S., (2017). Chapter 10 - Learning Trigonometry: the Development of Geometrical Concepts and the Role of Cognitive Processes. Pages 221-246
Mehanovic, T. (2013). The effect of trigonometry instruction with dynamic trigonometry software; GeoGebra on Van Hiele trigonometry understanding levels of students. Educational Research and Reviews, 8, 1509-1518.
Mert, M. S. (2010). Student engagement, 21st century skills, and how the iPad is (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest, UMI Dissertation Publishing. (Accession: 3566043).
Ong, W. R. (2012). Computer-based Instruction's (CBI) Rediscovered Role in K-12; An evaluation case study of one high school's use of CBI to improve pass rates on high-stakes tests. Educational Technology Research & Development, 56(2), 147-160.
Opit, R. A. (2012). The effects of GeoGebra on mathematics achievement: Enlightening coordinate trigonometry learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 686-693.
Poret, T. (2011). Module 5 Modeling with Trigonometry. Secondary Mathematics III: An Integrated Approach.
Santos, W. M. (2014). Geometric knowledge of middle school students in a reform-based mathematics curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 98(4), 188-197.
Tarmizi, J. (2010). A comparison of iPads and worksheets on math skills of high school students with emotional disturbance. Behavioral Disorders, 37(4), 232-243.
Uy, F. (2010). Module 5 Modeling with Trigonometry. Secondary Mathematics III: AnIntegrated Approach.
Weart, P. (2011). Nature and extent of iPad use among freshmen honors students. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 42(1), 21-38.
Yunus, L. R. (2009). The role of computers in mathematics teaching and learning. Using Information Technology in Mathematics Education, 11, 41-55.
Zengin, N. (2011). iPad infuse creativity in solid trigonometry teaching. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Techn
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Rholey R. Picaza
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
